The Hidden Truth Episode 8: Lights! Camera! Action! Part 4

Observation is a very important metric for determining truth. Everything comes from observation, the problem is most people have grown accustomed to being told what they observe without exercising their own power of observation to come to their own conclusions. That's what film making is. Film making is where they show you what they want you to see, while cleverly cutting out all the things they don't want you to see. But if you are using your powers of observation, you can still see flaws in the film making process. As time goes on, those flaws become more and more evident as the technology has improved.

Beyond observation is discernment. Observation doesn't do much good, if you can't figure out what you're looking at. You could be looking at the solution to world hunger or poverty, but if you don't know what it is you're looking at, the solution will pass you by. The combination of observation and discernment is required to understand things on deeper levels. It is because of this, that they get away with their lies so easily. However the moment you can discern the lies for yourself, they lose their power and the truth emerges.

When you start to look at the Moon landing with a little more scrutiny, it begins to fall apart. For example, just have a look at the lunar lander. Does it really look like professionals built this?

If you are being completely honest with yourself, and if you were asked to describe how this was built, what would your answer be? What do you see? I'll tell you what I see. I see tin foil wrapped metal legs connected to heat ducting, and sheet metal, held together by curtain rods. What is seen is something a father would help a child build for a science fair. But there are more observations to be had here. Just the design of this space craft is hideous enough, but for the keen observer, there's much more to see. Lets zoom in.

Zooming in shows more of this professionally made space craft that landed two astronauts on the Moon. The sheet metal isn't even flush with the rest of the craft. It's bent, and fit into place as if a 5 year old tried to glue it into place.

There have been many people who have looked at this space craft and dissected it. I'm going to share with you a lengthy video coming from the now deceased Antonio Subirats. It's a 19 minute video, but he's actually quite a funny guy, he will show you the lunar lander with a sense of humor.

So as you can see the lunar lander really was not " space worthy." But there's more to observe and discern. Look at the first photo of the lunar lander again.

Do you see it?...... Look again.

And yet here on Earth we have images of skyscraper shadows that don't reach all the way to the horizon. The only conclusion that someone with an observant mind can discern from this, is that the wall of the studio they are filming in is very close. It might also explain why the Astronauts never saw any stars. Isn't it amazing how when you go to the Moon, the stars just simply vanish? Might that be because they would have to show a different version of the stars above that don't match Earths? Were the stars simply too hard to fake, that they just decided it was easier to say they couldn't see them at all?

There are more shadows that didn't match.

Even the small pole shadow in the middle shows the difference between the two big shadows, as if they're operating in a small room and their angle to the light has changed. It's clearly a film studio, and not an actual Moon landing. There's just too many holes in the story, too many unanswered questions, and too many obvious anomalies. Take a look at this video of the lunar lander leaving the Moon in Apollo 17...

So the camera man was just left behind to find his own way off the Moon. Or maybe he's still there. Or maybe he exited the room behind him and took a lunch break. Maybe you're wondering who that camera man might be. Well, rumor has it, its none other than the late but great Stanley Kubrick. Here's a photo of him meeting with NASA back in 1965.

You know, the director of the infamous movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. Who could do the Moon landing better than him? Maybe the first man to walk on the moon wasn't Neil Armstrong afterall.

In later films Stanley Kubrick also seemed to have a conscience about such a massive lie to the public, and in his movies he would drop hints that he was responsible for the Moon landing. Here's an image from the 1980 movie, The Shining....

Now lets observe the lunar rover from Apollo 15 for a moment.

Does that look like another professional designed piece of space equipment? Do the chairs look like flimsy lawn chairs? Does it even look like you would want to drive it anywhere? Does it look like 38 million dollars went into it?

38 million dollars and that's what they come up with. More importantly have a look at the antenna dish attached to the front. Apparently this dish back in 1971, was powerful enough to broadcast a clear signal back to Earth, better than anything else can even with today's technology. When even the media companies need big vehicles loaded with equipment to broadcast?

Isn't it incredible how back in 1969-1972 they were way ahead of their time? Well it gets even more interesting. When you look back at all the marvels of their achievements, you would think that there would be a record of it all. Records of exactly how they did it. Well guess what? For anyone with a questioning mind, who decides to demand proof of it all, NASA can't provide it. Apparently, they erased it.

A few people were able to question NASA and this is what they got in response.

So lets recap for a moment.... We have professional equipment that looks like a 5 year old put it together. We have shadows that don't align with the reality of an actual Moon landing. We have a movie director that had the capability to capture the greatest achievement of mankind on film. We have communication technology that is still superior to our best technology today. Then we have NASA, that despite their technological advancement, they say it's too hard to rebuild that technology, and that they lost all the data to do it. Is your head spinning yet? Or can we stop pretending now?