JustPaste.it

The Hidden Truth Episode 14: The Firmament Above Us Part 2

8e2f1b4710dfefea8151fb92ff66a5e7.png

 

Evidence of a firmament above us is everywhere. You can see it in rainbows, sun dogs and  thunder. These are natures hints. In fact, it would make total sense if there was a firmament or dome above us, because the entire weather cycle operates exactly like a terrarium.

 

c955db90ee6c062383ee701edf38994d.png

 

It's well known that terrariums can be self-sustaining for many many years without any human intervention. There's something about being within an enclosed system and life's ability to thrive. Isn't it amazing how water goes up and evaporates, and then comes back down in the form of rain? How would it be possible on a globe model for water to evaporate rising higher through an atmosphere that becomes less dense the higher you go, at what point does that water decide to turn around and come back down to Earth? Yet this makes complete sense if there's a dome above us, because the water can only go so high before it must come back down. As the saying goes, " what goes up, must come down." This is true because going up has it's limitations in the form a firmament.
 
This would also explain the cyclical nature of weather. We live within a system that is self-renewing. On the flipside, it also explains how the controllers of this world are capable of manipulating the weather. Including things like the idea of climate change. Once you realize that the Earth is not a globe, you instantly recognize climate change for the scam that it is.

 

There is one more thing that nature hasn't been lying about and if you can't trust nature, who can you trust? Since we are searching for authorities besides NASA, we have 3. We have the bible, we have nature, and we have amateurs experiments and observations. I'm going to show you proof from all 3 as the episodes go on. Nature has not been lying. It functions in it's cyclical and self-renewing patterns because it can. Nature abhors a vacuum. 
 
If there was no firmament above us, then all the higher pressure air would rush to fill the empty space. There would be no stopping it. A pressurized environment cannot exist next to a vacuum without a solid container. It would be like trying to have a BBQ with propane but no tank. You can't do it. The pressure needs to exist. This is why if you pop a hole in that propane tank, you get a rocket until the pressure is reduced.

 

01eccb6608476f108fc4cdbe0fb38c5b.png

 

NASA's science will explain it away claiming that gravity holds the atmosphere and creates a pressure gradient.Except this is impossible because any pressure at all, would dissipate instantly. The only example that exists of pressure existing next to a vacuum is the atmosphere in space. Convenient isn't it? I'll be talking about gravity in later episodes, but for now, you can see just how absurd it is to say that gravity holds the atmosphere in place against the vacuum of space.

 

Video thumb

 

Remember "nature abhors a vacuum". I want to give you a definition for this.
 
In a literal physical sense, the phrase describes the behavior of fluids and gases. When a vacuum is created, surrounding air or fluid rushes in to fill the space due to pressure differences; for example, air rushes into a vacuum created by a vacuum cleaner or when a sealed container is punctured.
 
This phenomenon is not because the vacuum "sucks" but because higher-pressure air moves into the lower-pressure vacuum. 
 
This destroys the "pressure gradient" argument.

 

6ba914d87ce6b8c576e904ba8a7b69b1.png

 

There are no experiments that can be done to demonstrate a pressurized environment next to a vacuum without a solid barrier. There are experiments however, that have been done showing us just how dangerous a vacuum is.

 

Video thumb

 

Video thumb
 

 

Video thumb

 

So what's more plausible? The idea that nature is contained within a self-sustaining dome, or are we just chilling next to the vacuum of space with only the magic of gravity keeping us alive and pressurized? Is nature lying to us? Or is it possible that this is really the model of our world?

 

a1a5291e2edb849f2af7238f458970d0.png

 

Given that I've already shown you that the stars follow a fixed, repeatable track in the night sky, does it not make sense then, that there is something they're attached to?

 

388a2b0a8822b43c200ae7ce5c80379f.png

 

Maybe it's time to open our eyes, and see our world the way it really is. When you really start looking for it, the firmament is everywhere. I'll show you in the next episode.

 

Links: 

The Hidden Truth Episode 1: Theory vs Fact

The Hidden Truth Episode 2: The Two Models

The Hidden Truth Episode 3: What Curvature?

The Hidden Truth Episode 4: The Short History of the Globe

The Hidden Truth Episode 5: Lights! Camera! Action! Part 1

The Hidden Truth Episode 6: Lights! Camera! Action! Part 2

The Hidden Truth Episode 7: Lights! Camera! Action! Part 3

The Hidden Truth Episode 8: Lights! Camera! Action! Part 4

The Hidden Truth Episode 9: Lights! Camera! Action! Part 5

The Hidden Truth Episode 12: Question Everything Part 3

The Hidden Truth Episode 13: The Firmament Above Us

The Hidden Truth Episode 14: The Firmament Above Us Part 2

The Hidden Truth Episode 15: The Firmament Above Us Part 3

The Hidden Truth Episode 16: The Firmament Above Us Part 4

The Hidden Truth Episode 19: The Biblical Earth

The Hidden Truth Episode 20: Hidden In Plain Sight

The Hidden Truth Episode 21: The Globe Map Lie