COVID-19 Not Proven to Exist
Deep state intelligence agencies frequently use the ploy of false "whistleblowers" to promote a lie in order to debunk a true narrative that gives away the intended deception - ie: to use propaganda to create a purely sensational virus that does not really exist. In this case the perception of a weaponized SARS-CoV-2 virus is promoted by appropriating cases of colds, Flu, pneumonia other respiratory infections - particularly among elderly populations at the end-of-life issues with comorbidities.
It's no coincidence that the WHO and CDC have abandoned collecting statistics on seasonal Flu making it easy for this respiratory infections to be fraudulently lumped into illnesses and deaths by COVID-19
Public Smells Fake Virus: In this case, virologist, Dr Li-Meng Yan dubiously claims that a weaponized virus was released from a lab in Wuhan. This story is conveniently released at a time when too many people are beginning to understand the mortality rate is very low with a 99.98% recovery rate for most people.
Covid-19 symptoms mimic seasonal FLU symptoms therefor the alleged SARS-CoV-2 doesn't qualify as scary PANDEMIC even if it really existed. The informed public has begun to view the Covid-19 as a terrorist tool of THE GREAT RESET.
Even if weaponized viruses were under development in Wuhan the allegation by Dr Li-Meng Yan is not proof that any such virus was actually released.
Dr. Kaufamn presents evidence that no RNA sequence has ever been identified. Covid-19 was never isolated, purified and subjected to the scientific rigors or Koch's postulates to prove Covid-19 is the actual causative agent for the alleged infectious disease.
Dr. Tom Cowan Transcript: For those of you who have been following my work concerning COVID-19, you know that the entire foundation of the story of the virus rests on whether the novel “corona virus” has been properly isolated and its entire genome characterized. Many of you have sent papers to me that have been published in prestigious peer-reviewed journals that claim to have isolated and characterized this new virus. They are all incorrect.
In fact, the original Corman-Drosten et al paper on which this edifice of viral causation is based states that they used an “in silico” genome of an “in silico” virus. “In silico” is Latin for “theoretical.” In common English, synonyms for theoretical are “imaginary” or “make-believe.”
The CDC in its July 2020 monograph states “no quantified isolated of the 2019-nCov are available.” Again, in simple English, this means they have no examples of an isolated virus in their possession. In Freedom of Information requests, the Canadian health ministry, the Australian health ministry and the governments of many Commonwealth countries admit that they do not possess any studies that show the isolation of this purported virus.
In this interview, and hopefully for the final time, Jon Rappaport and I describe in common language and precise detail the steps that are needed to properly isolate and characterize a virus. We did this so we could empower our readers and listeners to know for themselves how to read and identify fraudulent science. Among the many challenges we face, one is the rampant scientific illiteracy. In some ages this may not have been relevant, but if we are going to live in an era in which “science” is the new religion and its tenets control our lives, we had better understand what its unquestioned “priests” are saying.
I can tell you, the more I look into what passes for “science,” the more I see how rotten it is to the core. If we are to have a new “religion,” let’s have one of truth, freedom, justice and the sense of wonder and awe at the phenomena of life. Let us celebrate what it means to be a human being endowed with a free spirit in a loving relationship with the mystery that is our world. Please join me in this interview.
All the best,
PCR Tests Show Positive Because They Respond to Genetic Material Present in All Humans
BOMBSHELL: WHO Coronavirus PCR Test Primer Sequence is Found in All Human DNA
In Wuhan, the first suspected "Covid" patients were admitted with comorbidities. This begs the question as to what made these patients any different than what has become routine pneumonia hospital admissions, given the high level of air pollution in Wuhan.... Furthermore, no patients were reported as "deceased" until Jan 9th.
"It was not until January 9th that a first death was reported from the alleged Wuhan virus. The patient was a 61-year-old male admitted to hospital in Wuhan with several underlying medical conditions. Apart from respiratory failure and severe pneumonia, the patient also suffered from abdominal tumors and chronic liver disease." (!)
Dr Li-Meng Yan reports release of weaponized virus:
1/4/2020 -- WHO tweeted that there was a cluster of pneumonia cases – with no deaths – in Wuhan, Hubei province, People’s Republic of China, and that investigations to identify the cause were underway
1/5/2020: WHO reports Disease of UNKNOWN CAUSE
WHO Covid-19 Timeline
Devex Covid-19 Timeline
4 Jan 2020 -- WHO tweeted that there was a cluster of pneumonia cases – with no deaths – in Wuhan, Hubei province, People’s Republic of China, and that investigations to identify the cause were underway
WHO Covid-19 Timeline
The cluster was initially reported on 31 December 2019, when the WHO China Country Office was informed. The Chinese authorities identified a new type of coronavirus (novel coronavirus, nCoV), which was isolated on 7 January 2020.
(WHO) Novel Coronavirus – China -- What prompted a search for a new type of virus when the symptoms were no different than established causes of pneumonia? ie: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), Influenza, Parainfluenza, Adenovirus or Measles (?)
HAS PROVINCETOWN BECOME PROTEASE TOWN - By John Lauritsen New York Native 9 Dec. 1996