Non-governmental organizations were earlier viewed as philanthropic organizations that intended to change public policy with no other benefits. However, today their activity turned in the completely opposite direction; therefore they cannot be viewed as useful political and development tools. The main reason for such change is that non-governmental organizations began to neglect the interests of the community in favor of their own concerns and beliefs and the interests of their patrons.
The term non-governmental organization includes a diverse range of organizations from charitable organizations and relief agencies to development and policy organizations. Usually, non-governmental organizations are described as groups that promote public profit, rather than commercial interests. However, the understanding of their activity nowadays has changed because of plagiarismcheck.
In the modern world non-governmental organizations are viewed as organizations that promote the priorities and ideas or concerns of their donors, supporters, and sponsors rather than the interests of the societies they represent. They became a part of public and global politics, and their methods and actions do not always contribute to the benefit of society. Their liability and transparency were put under question because of cases when they had wrongly declared to serve the most vulnerable and denied groups but had a hidden purpose of getting a profit. It is clear that non-governmental organizations can perform the role of political tools, but this role is far from being useful.
A difficulty in non-governmental organizations is not concerned with a need for opinions or plans for improvements, but it is the issue that efforts to implement such changes are misused because they usually are frequently manipulated. Therefore, achieving development may be rather challenging because it can be directed toward the concerns and beliefs of usual people and social groups. The most important organizations tend to resist to development because it endangers the situation from which they profit. Such groups can include non-governmental organizations, governments, and private organizations that are personally involved in making collaborative decisions. Non-governmental organizations can undoubtedly put their own interests and the needs of their sponsors over the general social well-being. Therefore, involving them in a discussion is often followed with hesitation, as their involvement in most cases drives to contradictions, collisions, and setbacks rather than to the enhancement of useful and commonly recognized solutions. For this reason, they do not perform a role of important and useful mechanism of decision-making on the governmental level.
The other issue is that non-governmental organizations were initially supposed to have less bureaucratic procedures than governments, to be more effective in resolution processes, and to be able to adjust to fast-developing conditions by making diplomatic agreements. They were expected to utilize such attributes to be able to perform various roles in the community, like providing alternative methods of control to governments and becoming incentives, influencers, and opinion makers. The main problem is that the process of decision‐making in non-governmental organizations is difficult and not transparent today and often private interests lead them to inflict their beliefs over other stakeholders, managing participatory procedures in their own interests. As a result, the possibility to promote changes or perform central roles in political discussions was lost, and substantial harm was done to the reliability of such organizations. In relation to this, non-governmental organizations lost their credibility and trust of the society.
Non-governmental organizations cannot be viewed as useful political and development tools nowadays. Involving them in a discussion of important issues is followed with hesitations, as their involvement in most cases drives to contradictions, collisions, and setbacks rather than to the enhancement of useful and commonly recognized solutions. Besides, non-governmental organizations lost their credibility and trust of society because they began to put their own interests and the concerns of their sponsors in front of the common interests and needs of society.