Currently, Tsai Shuan-jin and her partner Jian Zhu say the measure should be considered unconstitutional because the RCMP did not consider charter rights during the E-Pirate investigation.
The region has heated up in the past few months with the discovery of a money laundering ring believed to be laundering significant amounts of cash by Asians. The Richmond-based Silver International and Style Travel Agency is believed to have served as a front-end business covering real-world activities. This was discovered when RMCP raids revealed illegal businesses.
Richmond money laundering business seized and searched
However, the two claim that authorities have violated a person's basic rights to life, freedom and safety by searching for evidence and searching essential to the investigation. The raid was able to take significant amounts of cash, worth thousands of dollars in East Asian currencies, as well as River Rock casino chips worth around C$17,800. They included both the travel agency's office and the couple's home.
In addition to cash and casino chips, police discovered a gift card worth about C$10,000 that could later be used for various payments. Jewelry pieces were also found in their homes, and according to police officers, illegal money laundering rings may have facilitated their purchases. Additional helpful money counters for the crime scheme were also confiscated along with the computer. Authorities are also chasing a Canadian $2.3 million home in Vancouver.
The RCMP has a major goal of learning more about the couple and getting to the bottom of the investigation to find out as much as possible about Kingpin and the business they have been running. Thanks to the incentives, authorities also inspected safe deposit boxes at Royal Bank and Chinese banks. In December, the couple made it clear they were demanding cash back from them as well as other objects, but the RCMP refused because the investigation was still ongoing.
couples who claim they are innocent
The investigation continues, even though the court case has collapsed, although the RCMP is believed to have accidentally identified one of the informants. The suspension of prosecution came unexpectedly, and for weeks, the RCMP and the Canadian Attorney's Office refused to provide an explanation for why the matter did not reach the court. The couple claims they have the right to keep their homes and businesses from being raided extensively.
They also disagree with the previous detention, pointing out that they are not legally responsible. With the help of lawyers protecting their personal and business interests, they filed a response to the lawsuit. According to the document, previously occurring civil forfeiture failed to state any legal basis on which it was taking place. You may recall pointing to claims that assets gained during a massive seizure, which cost more than CA$4 million, could be considered the result of the couple's illegal operations
The point to consider is that civil confiscation agencies do not require criminal convictions to pursue files and take action.