Comments on the latest speech of ISIS spokesman al-Adnani called "This was never our manhaj and it will never be"
By Markaz al-Sham @Markaz_Sham
(Full english summary of the speech can be found here: http://justpaste.it/f50h )

O Supporters of ISIS - this is your leader. No Quran No Sunnah - He is the one who decides who is on the Manhaj and who isn't.

His flimsy Hukm on them is just like their Takfir of the Syrian Mujahidin - Conspiracies and suspicion and thought. He manipulates, takes words out of context and then uses it against Zawahiri. Are these your leaders? That lie to take people down?

And I will expose some of his lies - and this is only to sincere people - because the blind ones have chosen their path. His whole speech is nonsense but I will focus on the points where he clearly manipulated words to deceive people.

1. First Lie: [74] This little liar is saying Zawahiri described Morsi as the hope of the nation. What this little liar did not say was is that Zawahiri critized Morsi for trusting secularists who still threw him to the sharks and told him he should denounce secular laws secular constitution, not accept treaties, establish shariah & seek to liberate Muslim lands & IF HE DID THAT he would be Ummah's hero.

You see how he did not mention all of those things but just took out the "You will be the Ummah's hero" to deceive people.

2. Second Lie: [73] AQ Manhaj being Hindus and Sikhs are partners in the country. Since when did Zawahiri say this?

He said. That meddling with minorities should be kept a minimum - and that the focus should be on the "Crusaders" and that if they transgress, then the response should be proportionate to what they did. Zawahiri explained that this was necessary so that the Americans wouldn't use these minorities as proxies . But this liar ignored all that and said he wants to share country with Hindus.

3. Lie 3: [79] This liar says they are being called Khawarij because they didn't go back to Iraq because they obeyed God so people call them Khawarij because they crossed a border and didn't want to go back? The Shia have found their match in lying.
He ignores hour+ of al-Shami explaining why they are the nearest group to the Khawarij and just blames it on not going back to Iraq.

4. Lie 4 [66] He says they replaced Jihad with revolutions and don't call for Tawhid anymore, do I really have to respond to this have they deviated for calling for revolutions against tyrants? If yes? Then even OBL (who's name they use) also called for revolutions and used the exact same words that you accuse Zawahiri of using. With this he is trying to say AQ basically became like the Ikhwan.

Those were the lies that I personally found, only Allah knows how many lies are in here. It's like a goldmine.

Also notice how he blames Zawahiri for bloodshed in Syria [Muhajireen and Ansar] - that's because he only considers his group Mujahidin. He only talks about his group and if the weather is sunny and the food was good maybe, just maybe he will include Nusra. But never others. 

Don't say "Sahwat" and don't say "Bayah broken" Adnani made it CLEAR - it's not about that - this is AQC and they "deviated"

My end opinion: Audio was nonsense, only blind supporters will accept it. Arguments = 0 [Hindus and Sikhs !?!?] - Zawahiri will crush them.