JustPaste.it

Lion VS Tiger : Back robusticity!

Two main studies will be used for the sake of this comparison :

First study : https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Osteology-and-ecology-of-Megantereon-cultridens-a-%E2%80%93-Christiansen-Adolfssen/f5dd2b7f596ef6b84aff81281e97e6f7f75422a6

Second study :

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmor.20382  

Without further ado, let's get into it!

-Thoracic height/centrum length (first study):

img_20250420_221200.jpgEdge : Lion

-Thoracic height/thoracic region length (second study):

Edge: Draw (0.0564 VS 0.055)

-Thoracic height/body mass (second study):

Edge: Tiger (0.1653 VS 0.1327)

-Thoracic spine length/centrum length (first study):

img_20250420_222534.jpg

Edge : Lion

-Thoracic Width/centrum length (first study):

img_20250420_223004.jpg

Edge : Tiger

-Thoracic width/thoracic region length (second study):

Edge: Lion (0.0618 VS 0.0599)

-Thoracic width/body mass (second study):

Edge: Tiger (0.1798 VS 0.1453)

-Thoracic area/thoracic region length (second study):

Edge: Lion (1.24 VS 1.14)

-Thoracic area/body mass (second study):

Edge: Tiger (3.24 VS 2.92)

-Thoracic region length/thoracolumar length (first+second study) : 

Edge : Draw (55.55% VS 55.2%)

Overall Edge in Thoracic Robusticity : Draw

-Lumbar height/centrum length (first study):

img_20250420_230621.jpg

Edge : Lion 

-Lumbar height/Lumbar region length (second study):

Edge: Lion (0.0833 VS 0.0763)

-Lumbar height/body mass (second study):

Edge: Tiger (0.1847 VS 0.1574)

-Lumbar spine length/centrum length (first study):

img_20250420_230818.jpg

Edge : Draw (overlap)

-lumbar width/lumbar region length (second study):

Edge: Lion (0.1261 VS 0.1127)

-lumbar width/body mass (second study):

Edge: Tiger (0.2725 VS 0.2382)

-lumbar area/lumbar region length (second study):

Edge: Lion (3.1256 VS 2.4851)

-lumbar area/body mass (second study):

Edge: Tiger (6.01 VS 5.90)

Lumbar region length/thoracolumar length (first+second study) : 

Edge : Draw (44.45% VS 44.8%)

NOTE: A third study also mentions that Lions have proportionally wider, more ventro-cranially and less cranially oriented lumbar processes with larger endplates and more anteriorly positioned spinous processes due to having more negative PC1 and PC2 scores. These features would play a role in strengthening the Lion's back. The Tiger's positive PC1 and PC2 scores would grant it taller neural spines which is an advantage but also more cranially oriented processes :

https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/116/3/721/2440504 

Overall Edge in Lumbar Robusticity : Lion