JustPaste.it

Puma VS Leopard : Back Robusticity!

Two main studies will be used for the sake of this comparison :

First study : https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Osteology-and-ecology-of-Megantereon-cultridens-a-%E2%80%93-Christiansen-Adolfssen/f5dd2b7f596ef6b84aff81281e97e6f7f75422a6 

Second study :

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmor.20382 

Without further ado, let's get into it!

-Thoracic height/centrum length (first study):

img_20250426_191726.jpg

Edge : Puma 

-Thoracic height/thoracic region length (second study):

Edge: Draw (0.050 VS 0.049)

-Thoracic height/body mass (second study):

Edge: Leopard (0.2905 VS 0.2630)

-Thoracic spine length/centrum length (first study):

img_20250426_191505.jpg

Edge : Draw 

-Thoracic Width/centrum length (first study):

img_20250426_191953.jpg

Edge : Leopard 

-Thoracic width/thoracic region length (second study):

Edge: Leopard (0.0571 VS 0.05161)

-Thoracic width/body mass (second study):

Edge: Leopard (0.3373 VS 0.2710)

-Thoracic area/thoracic region length (second study):

Edge: Draw (0.675 VS 0.6746)

-Thoracic area/body mass (second study):

Edge: Leopard (3.98 VS 3.54)

-Thoracic region length/thoracolumar length (first+second study) : 

Edge : Leopard (54.24% VS 53.84%)

Overall Edge in Thoracic Robusticity : Leopard 

-Lumbar height/centrum length (first study):

img_20250426_192107.jpg

Edge : Draw 

-Lumbar height/Lumbar region length (second study):

Edge: Draw (0.0686 VS 0.0675)

-Lumbar height/body mass (second study):

Edge: Leopard (0.345 VS 0.304)

-Lumbar spine length/centrum length (first study):

img_20250426_192221.jpg

Edge : Draw 

-lumbar width/lumbar region length (second study):

Edge: Leopard (0.1078 VS 0.1019)

-lumbar width/body mass (second study):

Edge: Leopard (0.5420 VS 0.4596)

-lumbar area/lumbar region length (second study):

Edge: Draw (1.6075 VS 1.58)

-lumbar area/body mass (second study):

Edge: Leopard (7.93 VS 7.24)

-Lumbar region length/thoracolumar length (first+second study) : 

Edge : Leopard (44.45% VS 46.1%) because lower score is better in this case.

NOTE: 

A third study also mentions that Leopards have proportionally wider, more ventro-cranially due to having more negative PC1 scores. These features would play a role in strengthening the Leopard's back. The Puma's positive PC1 scores would grant it more cranially oriented processes :

https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/116/3/721/2440504 

Overall Edge in Lumbar Robusticity : Leopard