The custom software development process refers to the steps used to bring a project from planning to completion. The software development life cycle (SDLC), which encompasses the following stages: planning, analysis, design, implementation, testing and integration, and maintenance, explains it better.
Depending on the requirements and nature of the project and/or team implementing it, multiple software development approaches are employed to carry out these processes. Choosing the proper method can be a big factor in software development success. You can use these strategies yourself or hire bespoke software development services to help you with the process.
Software Development Methodologies Comparison
There are several software development methodologies that organizations use to guide their development processes. Each methodology has its own strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases. Here’s a comparison of some popular software development methodologies:
Agile vs. Waterfall
Both agile and waterfall software development methodologies are indeed widely used, and their suitability depends on project characteristics. Let’s delve deeper into the comparison between these methodologies:
Waterfall Methodology:
One of the most classic processes adopted for custom software development, the waterfall technique, involves following an exceptionally sequential process. Being suitable for all forms of projects saves the clients consistent finances and time as every point is correctly planned in this procedure.
- Well-suited for projects with clear and well-defined requirements.
- Adaptable to shifting teams and following strict procedures and guidelines.
- Sequential and linear approach, where each phase is completed before moving to the next.
- Difficult to accommodate changes once a phase is finished.
- Suitable for smaller projects with stable requirements and limited client involvement.
Agile Methodology:
- Appropriate for projects with high client involvement and the need for flexibility.
- An iterative and incremental approach, with multiple cycles of planning, development, testing, and feedback.
- Emphasizes collaboration, adaptability, and responding to change.
- Allows for concurrent testing and continuous integration of changes.
- Suitable for projects where requirements may evolve, and regular client feedback is crucial.