It’s crucial to distinguish between “research” and “product development” since research generally entails intellectual or scientific study. Intended to benefit a company or society as a whole. Product development is motivated by the possibility for profit, which results in varied motivations and consequences.
Product development is in good shape. Research on lighting is not in a good state. There are numerous fundamental scientific questions that, if addressed, would help society as a whole and lighting product development in particular. just like a rising tide lifts all boats. Consider spectral content as one illustration. I’ve heard heated arguments that continuous spectra from sources like. Daylight and incandescent lighting are necessary for good biological and visual wellness.
The achievements of Product Engineering and R&D differ significantly. The R&D team develops product concepts and tests them to see if they are feasible. They turn the product on to product engineering once they have decided on a product and market research suggests a market.
Product engineering chooses the aesthetics of the product. Does the positioning of switches and adjustment knobs have any regulatory restrictions if there are existing items with similar features? requirements for size? Is the device’s readout to be included in the same package?
One can no longer rely just on paying attention to product-development pipelines to stay up to date with what might be coming to market because of the globalisation of R&D. Which has decentralised R&D, and naming practises for product organisations that varies by region. The verdict is still out on whether the methods used today will be more effective than those used in the past, which involved limiting the scope of projects in order to lessen uncertainty and improve the forecastability of crucial enabling features and technologies, before handing these enablers off to product development.