👇📖 Book🌴👇
Japan language
There Is No God, But Allah: The Secret of Eternal Salvation
We ascertain, through rational
demonstration, that God is pre-eternal (qadīm), such that origination (ḥudūth) or temporal inception is utterly incompatible with His nature. In a parallel vein, it has been intellectually established that He—Glorified and Exalted be He—is singular and indivisible in His Essence (dhāt), His Attributes (ṣifāt), and His Acts (afʿāl). Consequently, His Essence is neither composite (murakkab) nor constituted from discrete parts, contrary to the assertions of the Christians (al-Naṣārā); nor is it susceptible to any form of division or partition. Furthermore, the proposition that the Word (al-Kalimah) constitutes a part of the Essence inevitably entails the attribution of composition thereto—a predicate that belongs exclusively to contingent entities (al-ḥawādith). It follows therefrom that it is impermissible to construe the designation "Jesus is the Word of God" in the sense that...
he is a part of the Divine Essence.
The cross is not mentioned in Jewish texts as a religious symbol. Rather, the idea of Christ's crucifixion is part of the Christian faith, and Jews do not recognize it. On the contrary, they deny his prophecy altogether and believe that whoever is crucified is cursed.
Second: In Christianity
Christians believe that Christ was crucified to atone for the sins of humanity, which they call the doctrine of "crucifixion and redemption."
Third: In Islam
The Holy Quran denies the crucifixion of Jesus, peace be upon him, and affirms that God raised him to Himself. God Almighty said: “And their saying, ‘Indeed, we killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the Messenger of God.’ But they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him, but it was made to appear so to them. And indeed, those who differ about it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain. Rather, God raised him to Himself. And ever is God Exalted in Might and Wise.” (Surat An-Nisa: 157-158) Jesus, peace be upon him: God's Prophet, not his son
The Gospels themselves mention that Jesus called upon God and addressed Him as God. Is it conceivable that God would cry, be hungry, or pray for His own help? Jesus said in the Gospel, "My Father is greater than I" (John 14:28). When he raised the dead and performed miracles, he did not claim credit for himself or say, "I am the Lord, worship me." Rather, he would say, "In the name of the Lord" or "By the will of God."
Jesus, peace be upon him, was the greatest of the messengers, as stated in the Qur'an, but it was the distortion of the Jews and Christians that led to the alteration of his message. The Qur'an describes him as "the Word of God and a spirit from Him," a messenger of God and the son of Mary, not the son of God or part of the Trinity. God Almighty said: “O People of the Scripture, do not exceed the limits in your religion and do not say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was only the Messenger of Allah and His Word which He directed to Mary and a spirit from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers and do not say, “Three.” Desist; it is better for you. Allah is only one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and the earth. The heavens and the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs. (Surat An-Nisa: 171)
God sent Jesus, peace be upon him, to the Children of Israel, as He says: “And a messenger to the Children of Israel, [saying], ‘Indeed, I have come to you with a sign from your Lord.’” (Surat Al-Imran: 49) But the Jews among the Children of Israel denied him and wanted to kill him, while some of his followers believed in him, and they were later called “Christians.” They said, as the Qur’an states: “We are the helpers of Allah. We have believed in Allah, and bear witness that we are Muslims.” (Surat Al-Imran: 52)
In conclusion, following whims and heresy leads a person astray from the truth,
and there is no way to salvation
The Logical Impossibility of the Coexistence of Two Omnipotent Gods
~ A God with "Perfect Omnipotence" Must Absolutely Be Only One ~
### Logical Proof from Omnipotence:
"It is absolutely impossible for two omnipotent gods to exist simultaneously."
"If there were two gods, and one decided on a certain action, the other would necessarily have to assist it → thereby becoming a subordinate being and no longer omnipotent, or it would have to oppose it → thereby making the first god weak and defective, and thus no longer omnipotent."
Therefore, two gods cannot exist simultaneously.[62]
This proof can be rigorously formalized as follows:
1. Necessarily, the wills of two distinct persons can conflict (the possibility of conflict is included in the concept of "complete separateness").
2. Necessarily, if there are two essentially omnipotent beings, their wills can conflict. (From 1) ※ An essential property is "a property possessed in all logically possible worlds."
3. It is necessarily false for the wills of two omnipotent beings to conflict.
4. It is necessarily false for the wills of two essentially omnipotent beings to conflict. (From 3) ※ If there exists a world where conflict is possible, then there must also exist a world where both are omnipotent and their wills conflict.
5. The existence of two essentially omnipotent and distinct beings is impossible. (From 2 and 4)
6. Omnipotence is an essential attribute of God. (Necessarily true)
7. Therefore, the existence of two gods is impossible. (From 5 and 6)
【Proof of Premise 3】
8. Necessarily, if the will of an omnipotent being conflicts with the will of another, the latter's will is thwarted (otherwise, the former is not omnipotent).
9. Necessarily, one whose will is thwarted by another is not omnipotent.
10. Necessarily, if two omnipotent beings exist and their wills are opposed, both wills are thwarted → neither is omnipotent. (From 8 and 9)
11. It is impossible for two beings to be omnipotent while both remain omnipotent.
12. It is impossible for the wills of two omnipotent beings to conflict. (From 10 and 11)
13. Therefore, it is necessarily false for the wills of two omnipotent beings to conflict. (From 12)
**Conclusion**
The existence of two or more omnipotent gods entails a logical contradiction and is therefore absolutely impossible.
Thus, an omnipotent god must be only one.
(This is an ironclad argument shared as a classical proof in philosophy and theology, from al-Ghazālī, Thomas Aquinas, to Leibniz.)
We find that it is rationally established that God is eternal and pre-existent; it is not permissible for Him to be originated or created. Likewise, it is established that He—the Exalted and Glorified—is One in His Essence, Attributes, and Actions. Thus, His Essence is not composed of parts, as the Christians claim, nor does it admit division. Moreover, the claim that the Word is a part of the Essence leads to the assertion of composition, which is a characteristic of contingent beings. Therefore, it is not permissible to interpret "Jesus is the Word of God" in the sense that...
he is a part of God's Essence.
except by following the guidance that God has revealed.
modern-day Christians accept Moses as a Prophet and Messenger, elevate Jesus beyond his noble status (taking him as a deity) All the prophets of God including; Adam, Noah, Abraham, Issac, Jacob, and the tribes, Jesus, and Muhammad (peace be upon them), invited the people to the same thing, to worship The One God without any partners, son or associates. In order to understand why must worship Allaah (The One God,) we must first accept the Oneness of the Lordship of Allaah i.e. Tawheedur-Ruboobiyyah. This means to believe that there is only One Lord for everything that exist, its Creator, Organizer, Originator, Planner, Sustainer, Authority, Giver of Security, etc. and this is Allaah (One God). The belief in the Lordship of One God cannot be separated by the act of worshipping the One God i.e. Tawheedul-Uloohiyyah. This means to believe that none has right to be worshipped (e.g. praying, invoking, asking for help from the unseen, swearing, sacrificing, pilgrimage, fasting, giving charity, etc.) but Allaah. The final aspect of Tawheed is the Oneness of the Names and Attributes of Allah. This means:
Islam accepts, appreciates and reveres all three of these noble Prophets and Messengers, accepts all of the revealed scripture (in its original form) and Muslims make no distinction between them. There message was the same, their religion, one religion, that of Islam - the submission to Allah (the One true God) alone.
Knowing our Creator by His Names and Attributes
Left on their own, people can conclude that a Creator exists, but cannot come to a completely correct understanding of what Attributes this Creator possesses. They will tend to either conjure up an image of the Creator which resembles a created being, or will reduce the Creator to being an imaginary, being-less force.
The one who likens Him to His creation forms a picture of a created being in his mind, and this can only be done by likening Him to something which he has witnessed in his lifetime. Hence, he ends up worshipping an idol. Likewise, the one who attempts to flee from this by reducing the greatness of the Creator to the realm of philosophical conjecture ends up worshiping nothingness. The one who affirms all of Allaah's authentic Names and Attributes without likening them in nature to any created thing frees himself from the extremes of these two poles.
Tawheed: Islamic Monotheism - The Oneness of God
Your creator is one without partners, learn about the oneness of the creator.The statement 'Laa illaaha illullaah' will benefit the one who says it if he confirms to its meaning in his life, and doesn’t nullify it by associating partners with Allaah, such as supplicating to the dead or calling upon the living who are absent.
The Prophet said: "Whoever says La illaha illa-Allaah, it will be his salvation someday, no matter befalls him before that." (This was reported by Baihaqi, declared authentic by Albaanee in Ahaadeeth as-Saheehah
The Unity of Allah's Lordship
This first category of tawheed is known as tawheedur-ruboobiyyah or the unity of Allah's lordship. Through this we understand that it is Allah who alone created the universe which is why one of his divine names is Al-Khaliq (the Creator). Through this we know that it is Allaah alone who controls the universe and allows things to happen. This is why Allaah refers to himself in the Qur'aan as AI-Malik (The Owner of the universe). Hence when something happens, it only happens with the permission of Allaah:In the previous issue we talked about Tawheed (the Oneness of Allah). Shirk is its exact opposite. Linguistically, shirk means a partnership or to share or associate. However, Islamically it is to give to other than Allah, that which belongs solely to Allah. This means that parts of Allah's creation are given powers and attributes which belong to Allah, thus, ultimately sending worship to other then Allah alone. These parts of the creation therefore become partners with Allah.Shirk by Association - As Muslims we believe that it is Allah alone who Controls and Sustains the universe. Those who commit shirk by association believe that Allah is the Creator, but other parts of the creation also play a role in the running of the world. A classic example of this is the Christian concept of Trinity. Christians believe that God (Allah) alone does not regulate the affairs of mankind. They believe that the other two parts of the Trinity, Jesus (peace be upon him) and the holy spirit, also play a part in worldly affairs e.g Jesus pronounces judgement on the world and the holy spirit helps Christians through their daily lives. Qualities such as these should only belong to Allah. Hindus also commit this kind of shirk, with them having hundreds of different Gods for different aspects of their lives.
Unfortunately some Muslims have also fallen prey to this shirk. There are many from the Indian subcontinent who often call out for help upon saints and holy men who have passed away. One of the main saints whom they invoke is 'Abdul-Qadir al-Jeelanee'[3] whom they call 'AI-Ghawth-e-Azam' (the greatest source of help).
Shirk in Allaah's Names and Attributes (Asma wa Sifaat)
This category of shirk has two aspects:
(i) -Shirk by Humanisation - The Tawheed of Allah's names and attributes demands that we believe Allaah to be free from any human likeness. Those who commit shirk by humanisation give attributes to God which are more appropriate for human beings than an all-powerful Creator. Modern-day Christianity is again guilty of this shirk. In the Bible we find countless examples of God being given human attributes. In the book of Genesis, God is said to have created the world in six days and then rested on the seventh!! In other places God is said to have repented for his bad thoughts and felt sorry because of his actions!
This form of shirk has even taken some people beyond the limits of sanity. In India there are many Hindus who worship the Shiva Lingam Deity. This is an idol which is shaped and sized to represent the male genitals. For the Hindus it represents the reproductive powers of God, and they display their affection by massaging the deity with milk, water and butter!
These examples of humanisation are indeed an injustice to the almighty, who responds clearly by saying in the Qur`an:
"There is nothing like Him and He sees and hears all things" (Ash-Shoora, The Consultation 42:11)
(ii) - Shirk by Deification - This form of shirk occurs when created beings are given the names or attributes of Allah and thus become deities. This form of shirk is especially popular with humans, with many people being given a God-like status by ignorant followers. Jesus, Buddha, Rama, Zoroaster and many other famous religious figures of the past have been held to be incarnations of the all mighty. The twentieth Century has also seen many cults emerge, from which many leaders have claimed divinity. Sai Baba [4], David Koresh [5], Guru Rajnishi [6] and many more have all claimed this attribute which only belongs to AllaahShirk by Negation - Over the centuries many philosophies and ways of life have denied the existence of God. Buddhism and Jainism are amongst the major world religions which assert this belief. During the 18th and 19th centuries the advancement of scientific knowledge led many philosophers and scientists to claim that God was a figment of mans imagination. By cancelling the role of a supreme legislator, those who claim that God does not exist, ultimately attempt to make themselves masters of their own destinies. Some atheists also give Allah's attributes to his creation. By denying Allah, they say the world is eternal with no beginning and no end. And we know that this is only for Allah.
Shirk in Allaah's Names and Attributes (Asma wa Sifaat)
This category of shirk has two aspects:
(i) -Shirk by Humanisation - The Tawheed of Allah's names and attributes demands that we believe Allaah to be free from any human likeness. Those who commit shirk by humanisation give attributes to God which are more appropriate for human beings than an all-powerful Creator. Modern-day Christianity is again guilty of this shirkwe have the history of icons throughout the ages
The most notable iconoclastic occurrence in the Scripture is the Golden Calf occurrence, in which Moses led the demolition of the idol that the Israelites had built when Moses had been on Mount Sinai (Exodus 32). The following scriptural passages authorize such behavior:
• Leviticus 26:1: “Do not construct deities or set up a figure or a holy monument for yourselves, and do not establish a carved monument in your territory to bend down before it”, the Bible says.
• Numbers 33:52: “Force out all previous occupants of the property. Eliminate all of their sculpted pictures and cast deities, as well as all of their high positions”.
• Deuteronomy 7:25: “You are to destroy the pictures of their deities in the fire. Do not desire the silver or gold on them, and never grab it for yourself, or one will be trapped by it since it is abhorrent to the Lord your God
﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏﹏
The largest iconoclast in religious scholarship was King Josiah of Judah, who eventually razed the altar at Bethel, something that even Jehu had preserved, and also launched a crusade to remove all heathen and Yahwist sanctuaries in his dominion save the Temple of Jerusalem.
many Christians would rather have died than make offerings to the idols of Roman deities, and even eating a meal offered in pagan sanctuaries was forbidden for early Christians.
as Christianity moved away from its Jewish origins, it soon started to include “pagan” customs such as the veneration of icons of Mary and Jesus, while still detesting depictions of pagan gods.