JustPaste.it

Morphological Forelimb Comparison Between Panthera Pardus And Panthera Onca !

img_20220203_120829.jpg

Scapula Length Index :

Scapula length divided by Forelimb length. Higher score Indicates greater speed of movement via relative proportions of components of the proximal forelimb as well as exertion of greater force from the forelimb.

P.Pardus : 33%

P.Onca : 34%

Edge: P.Onca 

Glenoid Process Index :

Glenoid Process/scapula Length.Lower score Indicates greater shoulder mobility.

P.Pardus : exact value unknown 

P.Onca : exact value unknown 

15507413f19ed0b0587d4fc9b515a0cb.png

Edge : P.Pardus 

Spina Scapula Index :

Spina scapula/scapula length. Higher score Increases attachment point for several muscles such as trapezius muscles. 

P.Pardus(open triangle) : exact value unknown 

P.Onca(open circle) : exact value unknown 

ab5f228e5489ce54025527335c25f852.png

Edge : P.Onca

M.teres Major Index :

Higher score Indicates greater power for shoulder extension. 

P.Pardus : exact value unknown 

P.Onca : exact value unknown

15507413f19ed0b0587d4fc9b515a0cb.png

Edge : P.Pardus 

Infraspinous Fossa Index :

Higher score Indicates greater infraspinatus muscle attachement which functions a rotator cuff muscle providing glenohumeral stability. 

P.Pardus(open triangle) : exact value unknown 

P.Onca(open circle) : exact value unknown 

5fa08ad377f113aef5d3b56f9b1bb347.png

Edge : P.Onca

Supraspinous Index :

supraspinous fossa / scapula length. Higher score Indicates greater supraspinatus muscle attachement. This muscle helps to resist the gravitational forces which act on the shoulder joint to pull from the weight of the upper limb downward and to stabilize the shoulder joint by keeping the head of the humerus firmly pressed medially against the glenoid fossa of the scapula resulting in exertion of greater force from the forelimb. 

P.Pardus(open triangle) : exact value unknown 

P.Onca(open circle) : exact value unknown 

f974b274d7c02b6c98f90757d4d0aacb.png

Edge : P.Onca  

M.teres Major Index 2 :

Higher score Indicates greater power for shoulder extension. 

P.Pardus : 16%

P.Onca : 14%

Edge : P.Pardus  

GL/LI :

Lower score provides greater power and higher velocity to the Forelimb.

P.Pardus : 300%

P.Onca : 268%

Edge : P.Onca  

Deltoid Index :

Deltoid crest length divided by humerus articular length. Higher score Displays greater mechanical advantage of deltoid muscles at the shoulder joint.

P.Pardus : exact value unknown 

P.Onca : exact value unknown 

b344ef6730db97d59712b4f872744637.png

Edge : P.Onca 

HRI :

It is humerus mediolateral diameter at mid-shaft/humerus length. Robust forelimb bones protect the animal from violent stresses during grappling and increase muscle mass.

P.Pardus : 8%

P.Onca : 9%

Edge : P.Onca

HRI2 :

It is humerus anteroposterior diameter at mid-shaft/humerus length. Robust forelimb bones protect the animal from violent stresses during grappling and increase muscle mass.

P.Pardus  : 12%

P.Onca : 12%

Edge : Draw 

HCMI :

Often-used variable in analyses of bone strengths in locomotion. The higher the ratio is, the thicker the Humeral bone is.

P.Pardus : 29%

P.Onca : 32%

Edge : P.Onca

KCC :

values closer to 100% signify relatively thinner cortical bone and values closer to 0% signify relatively thicker cortical Humeral bone.

P.Pardus : 67%

P.Onca : 64%

Edge : P.Onca

KML :

values closer to 100% signify relatively thinner cortical bone and values closer to 0% signify relatively thicker Humeral cortical bone.

P.Pardus : 60%

P.Onca : 60%

Edge : Draw 

CA/Length :

This measure is used to estimate aspects of long Humeral strength in axial compression.

P.Pardus : 82%

P.Onca : 126%

Edge : P.Onca

Lx/length :

This measure is used to estimate aspects of long Humeral strength in bending about mediolateral plane.

P.Pardus(n°21) : exact value unknown

P.Onca(n°20) : exact value unknown

fe0dedd39bbd47c1388fdb186e2057e2.jpg

Edge : P.Onca

Ly/length :

This measure is used to estimate aspects of long Humeral strength in bending about craniocaudal plane.

P.Pardus(n°21) : exact value unknown

P.Onca (n°20) : exact value unknown

4d23b2d7ea953e878ec04fc8eb10747b.jpg

Edge : P.Onca

J/2/length :

This measure is used to estimate aspects of long Humeral strength in average rigidity in non-axial loading.

P.Pardus(n°21) : exact value unknown

P.Onca (n°20) : exact value unknown

e072815f9bb368171700c66d1102715e.jpg

Edge : P.Onca

HCSI:

Cross-Section/divided by Length of humerus. A higher score determines a greater Humeral robusticity.

P.Pardus  : exact value unknown

P.Onca : exact value unknown

86b5a6557d5c1015e4d701e7a5ca391e.jpg

Edge : P.Onca

HDWI :

It is Humeral distal width/length ratio, correlated with resistance to stresses at the elbow joint. A higher ratio also increases muscle attachement.

P.Pardus : 24%

P.Onca : 26%

Edge : P.Onca

HEI :

The HEI index measures the relative size of wrist stabilizing muscles and well as several grasping muscles in area which facilitate prey grasping. These muscles also likely helps stability, pushing, and agility when legs are on ground.

P.Pardus : 23%

P.Onca : 26%

Edge : P.Onca 

HCI :

This is a measure of the humerus joint surface size near elbow. More positive PC1 scores indicate greater forearm mobility and stability during grappling and also likely when feet are on ground during a struggle as well as an increased ability to better distribute large loads.

P.Pardus(n°22) : exact value unknown 

P.Onca(n°21) : exact value unknown 

d392bc91a57b6b33e8c4badc7b564c8f.png

Edge : P.Onca

PC2 :

Scoring intermediate or low on PC2 are carnivorans that use their forelimbs to subdue,manipulate or excavate food items.Carnivorans scoring low on PC2, i.e. grapplers like felids, have relatively shallow trochlear furrows and relatively large and distally-projecting medial trochlear flanges. These features provide extra stability against forces acting in a nonparasagittal plane.

P.Pardus : 1,072

P.Onca : -1,713

Edge : P.Onca

HAA :

This is another measure of area of where humerus terminates in elbow. More positive PC1 scores are associated with better grappling and distributing heavier loads.

P.Pardus(n°22) : exact value unknown 

P.Onca(n°21) : exact value unknown 

d392bc91a57b6b33e8c4badc7b564c8f.png

Edge : P.Onca 

Brachial Index :

This measures radius length/humerus length. Lower scores in this ratio indicate greater forelimb muscle mechanical advantage and results in stronger muscles all else being equal.

P.Pardus : exact value unknown 

P.Onca : exact value unknown

110af99c5436325718abd270c75dac5d.png

Edge : P.Onca 

Brachial Index 2 :

This measures ulna length/humerus length. Lower scores in this ratio indicate greater forelimb muscle mechanical advantage and results in stronger muscles all else being equal.

P.Pardus : exact value unknown

P.Onca : exact value unknown

b31389d286b1ba1991e83143a2d3279b.png

Edge : P.Onca

OI :

This metrics estimates tricep muscle strength. High values indicate greater ability to push with arms all else being equal. This helps a grappling cat hold prey and also helps a canid push and knock down an opponent. In addition, higher values may indicate greater stability and ability to change direction in a fight.

P.Pardus : 21%

P.Onca : 24%

Edge : P.Onca

URI :

This measures ulna anteroposterior diameter at midshaft divided by ulna length. As mentioned above for humerus robusticity, a robust ulna resists stresses on bones during fights and increases resistance to bites to the forelimb as well as muscle mass.

P.Pardus : 9%

P.Onca : 10%

Edge : P.Onca 

RRI : 

This measures radius mediolateral diameter at midshaft divided by radius length. As mentioned above for humerus robusticity, a robust radius resists stresses on bones during fights and increases resistance to bites to the forelimb as well as muscle mass.

P.Pardus : 9%

P.Onca : 11%

Edge : P.Onca

RRI2 :

This measures radius anteroposterior diameter at midshaft divided by radius length. As mentioned above for humerus robusticity, a robust radius resists stresses on bones during fights and increases resistance to bites to the forelimb as well as muscle mass.

P.Pardus : 7%

P.Onca : 8%

Edge : P.Onca

RAA : 

This is another measure of radius where it terminates at wrist. More positive PC1 scores help to reinforce the forelimbs against the stresses encountered by large, struggling prey and to distribute heavier loads. 

P.Pardus(n°22): exact value unknown

P.Onca (n°21) : exact value unknown

d831e845e96eb1d57c7ecbf57fce85a2.jpg

Edge : P.Onca

RAI :

This is a measure of joint area where radius meets wrist joint. More positive PC1 scores indicate larger forces are put on joints either through larger muscles, or external stresses which helps grappling or ability to fight with feet on ground (i.e. ability to quickly change directions, stability, etc.).

P.Pardus(n°22): exact value unknown

P.Onca (n°21) : exact value unknown 

d831e845e96eb1d57c7ecbf57fce85a2.jpg

Edge : P.Onca

PAW :

This is a measurement of paw width on forelimbs and gives us an idea of how well-paws are designed to hold prey. In addition, relatively wider paws likely increase stability while feet are on ground.

P.Pardus : 73%

P.Onca : 82%

Edge : P.Onca 

MCP :

proximal phalanx to metacarpal ratio, more negative PC2 and DF1 scores offer increased surface area for grasping and grappling and greater relative proportions of proximal and distal elements of the manus and size of the palmar surface. 

P.Pardus(n°22) : exact value unknown 

P.Onca(n°21) : exact value unknown 

d392bc91a57b6b33e8c4badc7b564c8f.png

b705e5da675a86b3d23b78a797a48b1d.png

Edge : P.Onca 

MC3RI :

This measures the robusticity of metacarpal 3 or longest finger/digit. More negative PC1 scores may assist with grappling or stresses exerted with feet on ground during a fight. 

P.Pardus(n°22) : exact value unknown 

P.Onca(n°21) : exact value unknown 

d392bc91a57b6b33e8c4badc7b564c8f.png

Edge : P.Pardus

MC3AA :

This is a measure of size of metacarpal at joints of finger. Higher PC1 Scores help stabilize the metacarpals against stresses from prey and climbing. 

P.Pardus(n°22) : exact value unknown 

P.Onca(n°21) : exact value unknown 

d392bc91a57b6b33e8c4badc7b564c8f.png

Edge : P.Onca

 

 

Studies Used For The Above Comparison :

 

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45167787_Radiographs_Reveal_Exceptional_Forelimb_Strength_in_the_Sabertooth_Cat_Smilodon_fatalis

 

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228546271_Locomotor_Evolution_in_the_Carnivora_Mammalia_Evidence_From_the_Elbow_Joint

 

 

 https://publikationen.uni-tuebingen.de/xmlui/handle/10900/48480

 

 

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7531697_Body_size_ofSmilodon_Mammalia_Felidae

 

 

 

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Osteology-and-ecology-of-Megantereon-cultridens-a-%E2%80%93-Christiansen-Adolfssen/f5dd2b7f596ef6b84aff81281e97e6f7f75422a6

 

 

 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23720916_Forelimb_Indicators_of_Prey-Size_Preference_in_the_Felidae

 

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/20806549_Differential_scaling_of_the_long_bones_in_the_terrestrial_carnivora_and_other_mammals

 

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/paleobiology/article/abs/morphological-convergence-of-the-preykilling-arsenal-of-sabertooth-predators/E197BBE86606E3F5F2AC3CE14674CB96 

 

 

As can be seen, Panthera Onca has relatively overall stronger shoulders, thicker Forelimb bones with larger articular areas,epicondyles,condyles,olecrana,wider humeri distal ends, shorter forelimbs,wider paws, greater manus proportions and metacarpal articular areas while Panthera Pardus simply has relatively more robust metacarpals. Additionally, the Jaguar has a proportionally more powerful bite and stronger teeth : 

img_20220716_000448.jpg

https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/151/2/423/2630862 

Jaguars also seem to benefit from having proportionally more powerfully built backs based on these graphs :

0d9d51765509ed7c26afdbd54c2d957a.png

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Osteology-and-ecology-of-Megantereon-cultridens-a-%E2%80%93-Christiansen-Adolfssen/f5dd2b7f596ef6b84aff81281e97e6f7f75422a6 

Having a stronger back would improve the Jaguar's strength and stability as explained here :

c205aea55b058e80301c330035011e23.png

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5538150_How_to_Build_a_Mammalian_Super-Predator 

 All of the Jaguar's physical advantages would enable it to outgrapple a similarly-sized Leopard and since the former is significantly heavier on average : 

img_20220716_000709.jpg

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229600388_Locomotor_behaviour_in_Plio-Pleistocene_sabre-tooth_cats_A_biomechanical_analysis 

Odds would increase in the Jaguar's favor to the point where it becomes totally one-sided !