Laws and their needs in society:
A society's laws are critical because they act as a code of conduct for citizens. It was also created to give suitable guidelines and order for all people's behaviour, as well as to maintain the government's three branches' equity. It ensures the smooth operation of society. There would be pandemonium if there were no law, and it would be survival of the fittest and everyone for himself. For the most part, this is not an ideal way of living.
The law is significant because it serves as a framework for what is considered acceptable in society. There would be disputes between social groupings and communities if it didn't exist. It's critical that we stick with them. The law makes it simple to adapt to societal developments.
What is common law and equity?
Common law refers to laws that are founded on precedent and the decisions of judges who hear cases in court. Equitable decisions, on the other hand, refer to laws that are similarly formed by court rulings but deal with judgement and justice. Even though the two courts are now almost the same, they used to be separated into two separate courts. Law Dissertation Writing Service
The use of common law and equity
Both common law and equity have their origins in England's judicial and legal history. Many legal systems with roots in English law, such as the United States and other English colonies, have adopted these concepts and techniques for justice. Understanding the differences between the two can be easier if you first grasp what each system is.
Common law is also known as:
Common law: laws made and upheld by a judge or jury hearing a case are referred to as "common law." This is sometimes referred to as "case law," because precedents are extremely essential in a common law legal system. On the other hand, equity usually refers to legal decisions that deal with justice and fairness and is often based on a concept of natural law. Law Assignment Writing Service
Courts for both laws:
Both systems of law have their origins in English legal traditions, although they come from two different courts. The legal courts of England established English common law, which was presided over by judges who functioned as the source and upholder of the law. Equity, on the other hand, emanated from the Chancery Courts, which were presided over by the governing monarch's chancellor. This arose primarily from English citizens' rights to appeal a common law verdict to the queen, who served as the last arbiter of justice. A king's chancellor was frequently appointed to function in his place.
Conclusion
As a result, the common law and equity courts were first separated, even though similar cases might be tried in both. The manner in which matters are heard and the type of judgement that can be made distinguishes the two in current legal practice. The majority of common law matters are heard by a jury, with a judge serving as the arbiter, and rulings might result in penalties or monetary reparation. Law Essay Writing Service