If you want to write your dissertation perfectly, you must play it like a game:
Your script will only be read once by the readers:
The external examiners and the 2nd reader are the most important players in the game (apart from the academic supervisor). Keep in mind that these people will only read your script once. As a result, your script must be completely logical and meaningful to someone reading it for the first time.
Ensure that your goals and outcomes are matched:
The 'dissertation proposal' document should include objectives and expected outcomes, as this offers early direction and simplifies first dialogue with the supervisor. However, it is unavoidable that a dissertation be 'judged' in order to determine whether the declared objectives were met. So, it's important that the dissertation goals reflect what was actually accomplished rather than what was 'envisioned' or intended in the proposal document.
Keep your personal baggage in the closet and don't speculate:
In general, there must be no supposition in the dissertation. This includes your personal views, regardless of how well-informed or knowledgeable you believe you are. It's likely that you have specific expertise that contributes to your decision to pursue a particular dissertation topic over another. A researcher, on the other hand, should not be a primary source of 'evidence' (primary data) for his or her own research/investigation.
The 'critically' important criterion for a good dissertation is frequently 'access' to a large number of key informants.
Ensure that you assist your supervisor:
Make every effort to assist the supervisor in assisting you. Because he or she may misinterpret or be unaware of the difficulties or problems you are facing, a supervisor may accidentally provide unsuitable advise.
Don't try to cram too much into your day.
A successful dissertation will most likely be a precise and complete examination of a small area rather than a broad review of a large area. The majority of students attempt far more than they are capable of.
Selecting a supervisor:
Although it is desirable for a supervisor to be well-versed in the subject or issue under investigation, it is often far more vital that the supervisor is well-versed in the desired approach and enjoys supervising. The dissertation's final subject or topic is frequently not the subject or topic that was originally envisioned in the student's proposal document. So, having a supervisor with certain specialist knowledge is less crucial than is commonly imagined. Indeed, it may be argued that choosing a supervisor with specialist expertise limits a student's ability to create his or her own ideas and themes.
Manage your time:
Regrettably, even the most meticulously planned work schedule is rarely (never) followed. The repercussions of 'falling behind' might, in fact, cause unnecessary and counterproductive anxiety. A dissertation, simply said, cannot be 'scheduled.' Knowledge and understanding are rarely acquired in accordance with pre-determined work plans. Students must, however, be committed to finishing their dissertation within a certain time frame. You'll probably never finish if you don't have this 'determination.' The dissertation will take up all of your available time.
Analytical comparison:
It is frequently advantageous for pupils to use a learning strategy known as comparative analysis. This entails looking at a number of different, but connected, procedures, processes, events, or even scenarios. The dissertation's requisite rigour, as well as the quality of its consequences (conclusions and suggestions), are obtained as a direct result of the comparative analysis process. Comparative analysis is a well-accepted method for gaining knowledge and understanding, particularly in the case of situations that would otherwise be too difficult to solve.
Plagiarism and collusion:
A dissertation is meant to be a long period of autonomous study for the student. Students are also expected to employ 'informants' (and other primary data sources) as well as published books (and other secondary data sources). Students must always acknowledge the source(s) of all data, information, and ideas that are not entirely the result of their own independent work to comply with very strict university regulations regarding plagiarism and collusion. To put it another way, it is perfectly acceptable to use other people's ideas and thoughts as long as the source of those ideas and thoughts is properly acknowledged. Dissertations Help