The Minnesota appellate courts have recently issued several significant decisions regarding prejudgment interest in insurance cases. These rulings interpret Minn. Stat. § 549.09, focusing on the requirements and implications of written notices of claims and the calculation of prejudgment interest. Key cases, such as Blehr v. Anderson and Elm Creek Courthome Ass’n, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., address the specifics of what constitutes adequate notice and who can issue it. These decisions impact how claims are evaluated and highlight the importance of staying informed about legal developments in prejudgment interest.