WIGINGTON DENIAL of DEW DEBUNKED

Major Scoop! I was just on Dane Wigington's Geoengineering Watch site on his page on Engineered Droughts - https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/category/drought-2/ - I was reading some of his ideas about what he sees as false claims by people who have been presenting what they think is evidence that some of the wild fires have been caused by energy weapons (DEW's), and he had a copy of the picture that don posted yesterday, beneath Dane's claim that he had the original photo without the beam in it, and that the beam had been photoshopped in by hoaxers. 

I saved that jpg with both images on it, intending to share it with this GMA.Media forum, but when I opened it in my graphics software, I first noticed that the color on the version with the beam in it is distinctly more vibrant with more contrast, which should not be possible if it were photoshopped. Then I noticed that in the version without the beam, in the area where the beam is showing in the other version, there seems to be a somewhat blurry streak where the beam would be. I then examined both versions more closely and found that the detail is much better in the one with the beam, and that there are digital artifacts in the sky of the version without the beam above the peak where the beam is in the other version, which has no digital artifacts.

So my conclusion is that the beam was photoshopped out of the version without the beam, and that this was then presented by Wigington as evidence that the DEW theory is supposedly the product of "hoaxers." When the truth is that Wigington himself, or as I surmise, possible intelligence assets he may work with, did the photo-alteration work as an attempt to distort the facts around these fires. There is much other reasoning in Dane's piece on this page that I think is suspect and may be there to deny evidence and confuse people. I include the photo in question below, as well as a blow up of the area above the mountain where the beam emerges, where you can see the lack of detail and digital artifacts in the image with no beam.   --Bruce