Repression Of Peasant Movement In India | UPSC with Nikhil

Major clashes erupted in some of the locations, the maximum splendid of which turned into Khanpur, wherein twenty peasants had been killed. Repression continued, and the movement turned into efficaciously useless through the cease of February. In March, there had been some incidents as well, however, they had been simply the closing gasps of death warfare.

• The Muslim League Ministry did not get the invoice handed withinside the Assembly, and it wasn`t till 1950 that the Congress Ministry handed the Bargadars Bill, which included the motion's needs in substance.

• Dinajpur, Rangpur, Jalpaiguri, Mymensingh, Midnapore, and to a lesser quantity 24-Parganas and Khulna had been the principal facilities of the motion.

• The Rajbansi Kshatriya peasants had been the preliminary target, however, it quickly unfold to Muslims, Hajongs, Santhals, and Oraons. Krishnobinode Ray, Abani Lahiri, Sunil Sen, Bhowani Sen, Moni Singh, Ananta Singh, Bhibuti Guha, Ajit Ray, Sushil Sen, Samar Ganguli, and Gurudas Talukdar had been a number of the motion's key figures. Repression of Peasant Movement In India.

• It is hard to evaluate the effect of this sort of various and sundry warfare, however, it may be asserted that the peasant moves that swept big swaths of the subcontinent withinside the Thirties and Forties created the weather that necessitated post-independence agrarian reforms, even though they did now no longer acquire on the spot success.

• Zamindari abolition, for example, did now no longer arise as an immediate end result of any specific warfare, however, the Kisan sabha's popularisation of the call for honesty aided in its realization.

• The discount of taxes, the abolition of unlawful cesses or feudal levies, and begar or this, the cease of oppression through landlords and their agents, the discount of debts, the healing of illegally or illegitimately seized lands, and safety of tenure for tenants had been the on the spot needs on which struggles had been fought withinside the pre-Independence days.

• Agricultural laborers' needs, except for some wallets in Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat, did now no longer surely come to be a part of the motion. These needs had been primarily based totally on the peasantry's current focus on their simple or valid rights, which turned into a manufactured from tradition, custom, usage, and prison rights and of it.

• Peasants had been inclined to face up to whilst landlords or the authorities demanded what they noticed as illegitimate — excessive taxes, exorbitant rents, unlawful cesses, compelled labor, or rights over the land they believed turned into theirs — if they might muster the essential organizational and different resources.

• They had been, however, inclined to retain to honor what they noticed as valid needs. The struggles primarily based totally on those needs had been actually aimed toward assuaging the maximum oppressive factors of the present agrarian shape instead of overthrowing it.

• Nonetheless, they weakened the landed classes' strength in lots of ways, laying the foundation for the shape's transformation. The Kisan motion turned into tasked with remodeling peasant awareness and setting up moves primarily based totally on that awareness.

• It is likewise really well worth noting that, for the maximum part, the peasant moves' kinds of warfare and mobilization, in addition to their needs, had been comparable in nature.