AiSensy vs Interakt: Best WhatsApp API in 2025? (+ Gallabox Comparison)
In 2025, choosing the right WhatsApp Business API platform can significantly impact how efficiently your business communicates with customers. As real-time engagement becomes more crucial than ever, many companies are comparing AiSensy vs Interakt to determine which tool offers the best balance of automation, pricing, and scalability. While Interakt has been a popular name in the market, AiSensy continues to gain traction thanks to its user-first design and flexible pricing.
To provide further context, we’ll also touch upon the AiSensy vs Gallabox comparison. While Gallabox remains a notable player, AiSensy still manages to outshine it in several key areas.
Pricing: Clear Winner on Cost
Let’s start with one of the most important factors: pricing. In the AiSensy vs Interakt comparison, AiSensy emerges as the more cost-effective option right from the start. It offers a feature-rich plan starting at ₹999 per month, ideal for startups and small businesses. Interakt, however, charges more for basic access, and many critical tools remain locked behind premium plans.
Now, shifting focus to AiSensy vs Gallabox, the trend remains similar. Gallabox starts at a higher price with limited flexibility in features unless you upgrade. AiSensy not only beats both on cost but also delivers more value in every tier.
Automation: Smooth Workflows Without Coding
When evaluating AiSensy vs Interakt, automation is another area where AiSensy shines. With its no-code chatbot builder, conditional message flows, and CRM integration, AiSensy empowers teams to automate conversations quickly—even without technical knowledge. Interakt, on the other hand, offers automation tools, but they are less intuitive and better suited to users with technical expertise.
In the AiSensy vs Gallabox comparison, AiSensy once again comes out ahead. Gallabox provides automation features, but its setup is more time-consuming and less streamlined than AiSensy’s plug-and-play system.
Agent Access: Unlimited and Unrestricted
Scalability often hinges on how many team members can access the platform. With AiSensy vs Interakt, AiSensy offers unlimited agent access across all plans—a massive benefit for growing teams. Interakt restricts agent access based on the subscription tier, which can hinder expansion unless you're ready to pay more.
Similarly, in AiSensy vs Gallabox, Gallabox also places limitations on agent access. This makes AiSensy the better choice for businesses expecting growth and needing the flexibility to scale their support teams seamlessly.
Analytics: Real-Time Insights That Matter
Analytics help shape better decisions, and in the AiSensy vs Interakt matchup, AiSensy delivers comprehensive dashboards with real-time data, campaign performance, and engagement metrics—even in its base plan. Interakt does offer analytics, but its reporting features are less detailed and sometimes hidden behind higher-tier subscriptions.
For AiSensy vs Gallabox, AiSensy continues to offer a more user-friendly data experience. Gallabox’s reports, while useful, lack the depth and real-time capabilities that AiSensy provides by default.
Messaging Costs: Affordable at Scale
When businesses run campaigns at scale, every rupee counts. In AiSensy vs Interakt, AiSensy remains more economical, with per-message marketing rates at ₹1.04. Interakt’s message pricing is slightly higher, which can quickly inflate costs during large campaigns.
This affordability extends to AiSensy vs Gallabox as well. Gallabox charges a bit more per message, making AiSensy the smarter choice for frequent marketers.
Customer Support and Onboarding: Help That’s Actually Helpful
The ease of getting started and receiving help when needed makes a huge difference. In AiSensy vs Interakt, AiSensy offers faster support and better onboarding tools, including detailed tutorials, videos, and live chat. Interakt’s support is responsive but lacks the comprehensive educational resources AiSensy provides.
Even in AiSensy vs Gallabox, AiSensy’s onboarding experience feels smoother. Gallabox offers basic support but falls short when it comes to detailed documentation or hands-on assistance.
Free Trials and Extra Tools: Test Before You Commit
When comparing AiSensy vs Interakt, it’s important to note that AiSensy provides a 14-day full-access free trial with no credit card required. This gives users the freedom to test the platform thoroughly. Interakt’s trial is more limited and doesn't allow full feature exploration.
Meanwhile, in AiSensy vs Gallabox, Gallabox doesn’t provide a fully open trial, which can make the testing phase more restrictive. AiSensy also bundles in useful extras like QR generators, internal notes, and chat links—tools that most competitors don’t offer in basic plans.
Final Verdict: AiSensy vs Interakt—Who Takes the Crown?
After comparing pricing, automation, scalability, analytics, and support, it’s clear that AiSensy leads the pack. In the AiSensy vs Interakt battle, AiSensy stands out with more features, better usability, and lower costs. It’s especially appealing to businesses looking to grow without being weighed down by technical limitations or escalating prices.
At the same time, looking at AiSensy vs Gallabox, AiSensy again proves to be the better all-around choice. Its combination of intuitive tools, flexible pricing, and generous agent access ensures it can serve businesses of all sizes.
In summary, whether you're evaluating AiSensy vs Interakt or AiSensy vs Gallabox, the winner remains the same. AiSensy delivers top-tier value and performance in 2025’s competitive WhatsApp API landscape.