Dominion Voter Fraud Articles

Shane @shane_st_pierre · Mar 28, 2021

“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results"

https://freedomwire.com/dominion-machines-forensic-test/

The Kraken Has Been Released! Forensic Voting Test In Michigan Shows Voter Fraud

Attorney Sydney Powell famously stated that she would be “releasing the kraken” with a lawsuit detailing information that proves that Dominion voting machines were designed to rig the election.

Until this point, only anecdotal evidence has been produced. Well, not anymore. The Kraken is being released at last.

A forensic test of Dominion voting machines in a small county in Northern Michigan was conducted, and the results confirm what Powell and other Trump lawyers have been saying for the last month: Dominion voting machines were programmed to commit voter fraud.

The forensic test was conducted on voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan. On election night, the country reported final results that had Biden winning the county (and anyone that knows anything about that area of North West Michigan knows that was very unlikely. It is Trump country).

However, on November 5th, 6,000 votes were reversed and put in Trump’s column, giving Trump the county.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson claimed that the original results were simply a result of human error; it was all just a simple mistake. Except, that statement was false, according to Allied Security Operations Group, who conducted the forensic test.

Their report stated: “The Antrim County Clerk and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson have stated that the election night error (detailed above by the vote ‘flip’ from Trump to Biden, was the result of human error caused by the failure to update the Mancelona Township tabulator prior to election night for a down-ballot race. We disagree and conclude that the vote flip occurred because of machine error built into the voting software designed to create error.”

The key takeaway from the report brings the entire election into question…not just in Michigan, but in all states where the Dominion machines were used.

The forensic report said the following:

“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”

Translation: The Dominion voting machines are designed to constantly report errors. Those ballots are then sent to be “adjudicated.” Which simply means they are given to someone to count by hand away from observation.

What could possibly go wrong?

This squares up with reports from other states. In Philadelphia and Detroit, Republican poll watchers weren’t given sufficient access to observe ballots, and in Fulton Country, Georgia, suitcases full of ballots were hidden under a table only to be pulled out and counted overnight after the other election workers were sent home.

There has been an established pattern of votes being “counted” away from public view. Also, witnesses have noted a pattern of ballot machines being jammed and votes being resubmitted as many as 8, 9, or 10 times. That was according to testimony from a Dominion contractor who worked the polls in Detroit.

Hacking Critical Election Infrastructure
Apart from weaponizing information and using social to hack hearts and minds, hacking critical election infrastructure is also doable. In 2016, hackers breached databases for election systems in Illinois and Arizona, in the United States. This explains why as part of proactive election security measure, 36 states in the US have deployed Albert Sensors, a cybersecurity detection system that could detect hacking attempts and send alerts to federal and state government agencies. If the United States which parades some of the best cybersecurity brasses and professionals, struggles to ward of cyber-attacks, one wonders the fate of Nigeria where fire-brigade approach is a state policy. Interestingly, I read the Director General of Nigeria's National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA), Dr. Isa Pantami recently saying that the 2019 general elections may be disrupted if adequate information technology security measures were not put in place. Dr. Pantami raised the alarm at the 10th annual conference organised by Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA), Abuja Chapter. He was quoted as saying, ‘’terrorists may disrupt the national elections by hacking into the voter registration database of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)’’. Perhaps Nigeria should consider the aforesaid ‘’Sensors’’. We are also are of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) saying it will transmit the results of the results of the 2019 general elections from the 119,973 polling units nationwide electronically and in real time through the Nigerian Communications Satellites Limited (NIGCOMSAT’s) satellite. May I remind the INEC and Nigeria’s national security agencies that commercial satellites can be hijacked, or hacked. The Hackers News reports about an incident where a group of Russian hackers, most notably the Turla APT (Advanced Persistent Threat) reportedly hijacked a commercial satellite.

Conclusion
As the defining 2019 general election approaches, Nigeria must ramp up cyber-defence capability and cybersecurity standards to counter weaponized information, disinformation and influence operations on our democratic process by domestic and foreign vested interests. It is imperative that the National Assembly expedites passage of a robust data protection framework and privacy laws in Nigeria with a view to protecting citizen’s data from data breaches. The European Union GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) is a classic template.

2018 Venezuelan presidential election
www4.cne.gob.ve/ResultadosElecciones2018/index.php
Presidential elections were held in Venezuela on 20 May 2018, with incumbent Nicolás Maduro being re-elected for a second six-year term. The original electoral date was scheduled for December 2018 but was subsequently pulled ahead to 22 April before being pushed back to 20 Ma

https://donokereke.blogspot.com/2018/09/proliferation-of-weaponized-information.html

https://www.wsj.com/articles/venezuelas-guide-to-election-theft-11606684680

Here's What Was Discovered About Dominion Machines Used in a Swing State

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2020/12/15/new-report-says-dominion-voting-systems-has-a-remarkably-high-error-rate-n2581624

Judge Kevin Elsenheimer of the 13th Circuit Court on Monday ordered a "forensic imaging" of the Dominion Voting Systems machines and software used in Antrim County, Michigan, where 6,000 votes for President Trump were incorrectly attributed to former Vice President Joe Biden. The Michigan Secretary of State stated the error took place because of "human error" not a software "glitch."

The order was made after Antrim County resident William Bailey filed a lawsuit challenging the integrity of the election results. Specifically, he brought up concerns about how county election officials originally reported their unofficial results. The focus of the election results weren't on the outcome of the presidential contest but rather on a local proposal to allow a marijuana dispensary in town, the Detroit Free Press reported.

Earlier this month Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG) in Dallas inspected the election equipment. Originally the report wasn't going to be made public without receiving approval from the judge first. Elsenheimer came back and said a report can be released as long as the software's coding are redacted. In the newly-released report, ASOG stated Dominion's software has a 68 percent chance of errors.

"The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity," the report states. "The results of the Antrim County 2020 election are not certifiable. This is a result of machine and/or software error, not human error."

"It is critical to understand that the Dominion system classifies ballots into two categories, 1) normal ballots and 2) adjudicated ballots. Ballots sent to adjudication can be altered by administrators, and adjudication files can be moved between different Results Tally and Reporting (RTR) terminals with no audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicates (i.e. votes) the ballot batch," the report states. "This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity because it provides no meaningful observation of the adjudication process or audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicated the ballots."

"A staggering number of votes required adjudication. This was a 2020 issue not seen in previous election cycles still stored on the server. This is caused by intentional errors in the system. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency or audit trail," the report states. "Our examination of the server logs indicates that this high error rate was incongruent with patterns from previous years. The statement attributing these issues to human error is not consistent with the forensic evaluation, which points more correctly to systemic machine and/or software errors. The systemic errors are intentionally designed to create errors in order to push a high volume of ballots to bulk adjudication."

Matthew DePerno, the attorney representing William Bailey, went into further detail about the voting software's alleged error rates.

"We found that the Dominion Voting Systems is designed intentionally to create inherent and systemic voting errors. What I mean by that is when you run a ballot through the machine, even if it's a blank ballot, it will have a 68 percent chance of creating an error," DePerno told reporter John Solomon. "When you create an error, this machine does not reject the ballot. What it does instead is send it to a folder and that folder will then accumulate the ballots until the time that someone decides that they need those ballots. And then those ballots will be bulk adjudicated by someone. Could be offsite, could be onsite somewhere sitting at a computer. And, without any oversight, they can click one button, lope the entire batch of ballots to one candidate and then send them back to the tabulator."

According to DePerno, the machine's software has the ability to be programed to automatically bulk adjudicate ballots.

"We believe that what we found, and when you apply those findings to what we saw on Election Night, such as in Detroit, where ballot counting was shutdown at 2 o'clock and then we came back at 4 o'clock and there was large spikes of votes going to Joe Biden, we believe that, in part at least, that that happened because they decided to bulk adjudicate some ballots they had been saving up throughout the night," DePerno said.

Dominion Voting Systems has repeatedly denied there are issues with their voting machines or that their software could be used to swap votes from one candidate to another.

In fact, the company's CEO, John Poulos, published an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal on Nov. 30. In it, he defended his company, saying the voting machines "accurately tabulate votes."

There is no secret “vote flipping” algorithm. Third-party test labs, chosen by the bipartisan Election Assistance Commission and accredited by a program of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, perform complete source-code reviews on every federally certified tabulation system. States replicate this process for their own certifications. Postelection canvassing and auditing also exist to provide additional assurance of the vote totals’ accuracy.

The part of the election process on which Dominion focuses is highly regulated and certified. The company doesn’t work in noncertified areas such as voter-registration systems, poll books or signature-verification software, and it doesn’t provide vote-by-mail printing. Dominion voting machines do one thing: accurately tabulate votes from county-verified voters using a durable paper ballot controlled and secured by local elections officials.

During testimony in front of the Michigan Senate Oversight Committee on Tuesday, Poulos stated the goal of his company isn't to run elections but to provide machines to election officials so they can carry out their duty.

Trump Was Right Again: Dominion Voting Machines In Nevada Discovered To Have 70% Error Scanning – Higher Than Michigan's

http://www.christianitydaily.com/articles/10314/20201216/dominion-voting-machines-in-nevada-discovered-to-have-70-error-scanning-–-higher-than-michigans.htm

Dominion Voting machines in Nevada were allegedly discovered to have a 70% error scanning of ballots -- higher than that of Michigan's voting machines, a report reveals.

Citing a Twitter post linked to a Las Vegas Review Journal article, The Gateway Pundit said that what happened in Michigan regarding the Dominion voting machines "was not an isolated incident."

"The same thing happened in Clark County Nevada--Las Vegas," The Gateway Pundit announced.

This revelation came a day after Michigan Judge Kevin Eisenheimer allowed Attorney Matthew DePerno to release the result of the forensic investigation conducted on the 16 Dominion voting machines in Antrim County, MI.

Conducted by Allied Security Operations Group, the results showed that that Dominion voting systems in Antrim County were programmed to have a 68.5% error rate, giving it the ability to change 68.5% of votes, and greatly affecting election results.

The Gateway Pundit raised that this development in Dominion voting machine's status in Nevada on top of what was discovered in Michigan clearly points out that "it was systemic-purposeful fraud".

In their report, The Gateway Pundit showed a screenshot of their source tweet, which was from a certain Kanekoa who highlighted a portion of the Las Vegas Review report.

"DOMINION-NEVADA. The error rate scanning ballots in Antrim County, Michigan was 68.05%. Dominion Voting Systems are also used in Clark County Nevada. Clark County, Nevada election officialsalso *HAPPENED* to report an error scanning 'ABOUT 70% OF BALLOTS'," Kanekoa said.

Did Dominion Help Hugo Chavez Maintain Dominion Over Venezuela?

https://www.raptureforums.com/politics-culture-wars/did-dominion-help-hugo-chavez-maintain-dominion-over-venezuela/

Did Dominion Help Hugo Chavez Maintain Dominion Over Venezuela?
The disinformation media is projecting that all information challenging this fraudulent election is “disinformation.”
By Bosch Fawstin

The disinformation media is trying to stop people from exposing their disinformation. But it’s no longer working the way it used to because there are now too many independent journalists who have decided to do the job that journalists are supposed to do, which is to follow the truth to wherever it goes.

As I wrote on what’s left of my social media platforms, about the “no evidence” media:

There is “no evidence” that Islam motivates jihad, “no evidence” that antifa are fascists, “no evidence” that “anti-racists” are racist, “no evidence” that “peaceful protests” are murderous riots….

“This election was completely free of fraud.” -the fraudulent media

The “Kavanaugh was a gang rapist” media

The “Trump is an illegitimate president” media

The “Islam means peace” media

The “climate change is an existential threat” media

The “Trump is Hitler” media

The “Jussie Smollett attack was real” media

The violent riots are “peaceful protests” media

Etc.

Regarding the dominion software that the leftist media is desperately trying to Not Cover, here’s some of what IS being covered about it, from a story at Bongino.com titled Scenes From a Not So Free and Fair Election:

“Dominion has a software that it gets from a company called SmartMatics. SmartMatics is a Delaware company, but it’s owned by Venezuelans. Venezuelans who are close to Chavez and Maduro. They actually count the vote. They count the vote in Barcelona, Spain. So the vote goes from here to Barcelona, Spain. They count it and then they give it back to us.”

“Can their software change the vote?” Giuliani asks rhetorically. “Any way they want. Absolutely.”

He mentions the 6,000-vote flip in Antrim County, Michigan that we’ve heard so much about. Although election officials claim this was an accidental glitch, Giuliani believes otherwise.

Giuliani provides some background on SmartMatics. The company “was actually established by Chavez. And the whole purpose of it was to steal elections. It’s their expertise. Stealing elections.”

And this just in, from The Epoch Times, in an article titled “Whistleblower Alleges Software Manipulated Votes to Change Venezuelan Election Results”

“I was witness to the creation and operation of a sophisticated electronic voting system that permitted the leaders of the Venezuelan government to manipulate the tabulation of votes for national and local elections and select the winner of those elections in order to gain and maintain their power,” the affidavit states.

“From that point on, Chavez never lost any election. In fact, he was able to ensure wins for himself, his party, Congress persons and mayors from townships.”

The whistleblower claimed the “software and fundamental design of the electronic electoral system and software of Dominion and other election tabulating companies relies upon software that is a descendant of the Smartmatic Electoral Management System.”

“In short, the Smartmatic software is in the DNA of every vote tabulating company’s software and system,” the whistleblower said.

And I’ll leave you with this passionate woman from Venezuela warning about how Dominion election software, used by 28 states in America, was used to steal elections in Venezuela. And she even notes that –similar to our election—votes changed dramatically in the middle of the night.

Update: the leftist media is claiming that there’s no connection between the companies, Smartmatic and Dominion, that Guliani cited, but as usual, they’re lying.

Dominion

LOW AND BEHOLD:

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/elections/online-vulnerable-experts-find-nearly-three-dozen-u-s-voting-n1112436

an. 10, 2020, 6:36 PM EST
By Kevin Monahan, Cynthia McFadden and Didi Martinez
It was an assurance designed to bolster public confidence in the way America votes: Voting machines “are not connected to the internet.”
Then Acting Undersecretary for Cybersecurity and Communications at the Department of Homeland Security Jeanette Manfra said those words in 2017, testifying before Congress while she was responsible for the security of the nation’s voting system.
So many government officials like Manfra have said the same thing over the last few years that it is commonly accepted as gospel by most Americans. Behind it is the notion that if voting systems are not online, hackers will have a harder time compromising them.
But that is an overstatement, according to a team of 10 independent cybersecurity experts who specialize in voting systems and elections. While the voting machines themselves are not designed to be online, the larger voting systems in many states end up there, putting the voting process at risk.
That team of election security experts say that last summer, they discovered some systems are, in fact, online.
“We found over 35 [voting systems] had been left online and we’re still continuing to find more,” Kevin Skoglund, a senior technical advisor at the election security advocacy group National Election Defense Coalition, told NBC News.
“We kept hearing from election officials that voting machines were never on the internet,” he said. “And we knew that wasn't true. And so we set out to try and find the voting machines to see if we could find them on the internet, and especially the back-end systems that voting machines in the precinct were connecting to to report their results.”
Skoglund and his team developed a tool that scoured the internet to see if the central computers that program voting machines and run the entire election process at the precinct level were online. Once they had identified such systems, they contacted the relevant election officials and also provided the information to reporter Kim Zetter, who published the findings in Vice’s Motherboard in August.
The three largest voting manufacturing companies — Election Systems &Software, Dominion Voting Systems and Hart InterCivic — have acknowledged they all put modems in some of their tabulators and scanners. The reason? So that unofficial election results can more quickly be relayed to the public. Those modems connect to cell phone networks, which, in turn, are connected to the internet.
The largest manufacturer of voting machines, ES&S, told NBC News their systems are protected by firewalls and are not on the “public internet.” But both Skoglund and Andrew Appel, a Princeton computer science professor and expert on elections, said such firewalls can and have been breached.
“AT&T and Verizon and so on try and protect as best they can the security of their phone network from the rest of the internet, but it’s still part of the internet,” Appel explained. “There can still be security holes that allow hackers to get into the phone network.”
The 35 systems Skoglund’s team found represent a fraction of total voting systems nationwide, though he believes they only captured a portion of the systems that are or have been online. Earlier this week, Skoglund showed NBC three election systems were still online even after officials had been told they were vulnerable.
For election systems to be online, even momentarily, presents a serious problem, according to Appel.
“Once a hacker starts talking to the voting machine through the modem, the hacker cannot just change these unofficial election results, they can hack the software in the voting machine and make it cheat in future elections,” he said.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology, which provides cybersecurity frameworks for state and local governments and other organizations, recommends that voting systems should not have wireless network connections.
Skoglund said that they identified only one company among the systems they detected on line, ES&S. ES&S confirmed they had sold scanners with wireless modems to at least 11 states. Skoglund says those include the battleground states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida.
While the company’s website states that “zero” of its voting tabulators are connected to the internet, ES&S told NBC News 14,000 of their DS200 tabulators with online modems are currently in use around the country.