JustPaste.it
User avatar
@anonymous · Jan 14, 2024 · edited: Jan 16, 2024

Ammonia Engines

kjeldaabo.png

 

 

Forbes doesn't like it,

but Japan has proved

that Ammonia can be

an effective Motor Fuel

for Power Plant generators

and vehicles as well.

 

You don't hear Forbes

complaining of the

Safety Hazards of

Megatankers of LNG

 

Personally I prefer Methanol

as a fuel stock. It can easily

be produced from excess

Methane from Oil Drilling,

and can be made from Coal.

 

Methanol burns cleanly as

a fuel (catering Sterno...)

leaving CO2 and water vapor

as the exhaust products.

It can ALSO act as the

Hydrogen carrier for

Fuel Cells, providing back-up

Power for Electric Cars.

 

Since Methanol is liquid at

 common temperatures, it  requires no

Megainvestment in large scale

Cryonics to handle it. Consider

also that the refrigeration methods required for LNG also

produce HEAT... so the use of

Methanol eliminates that other

"Global warmer"

 

LNG must be vented in transport,

releasing greenhouse methane

to the atmosphere.

 

Methanol, being rather water-like

uses natural hydrogen bonding

to keep it in a liquid state. No expensive cryogenic pressure vessels needed...

 

Because of Methanol's hydrogen

bonding, it is also less volatile

than similar sized solvents.

 

That's good ! Less product shrinkage, and less unwanted

Atmospheric gasses.

 

Finally, when you consider safety

of Methanol versus LNG...

would you rather have global

extremists attack a Methanol

ship, which would leak, and burn...

 

Or have them anti-tank round

attack your multi megaton

LNG gasbombs.

 

Think about that, London...

and Boston ...

And Tokyo ...

 

Now Methanol, being a potent

Solvent, requires the proper

materials for handling.

 

You don't want to use Aluminum,

because Methanol can dissolve it.

So any Aluminum Block internal

combustion engines would have

to have Ceramic pistons and cylinder liners. This can be done.

Exhaust systems would likely

need to be stainless steel, for

the. same reason.  Catalytic converters would not be needed,

due to the harmless combustion

products. See...?

 

As for the toxicity of Methanol,

Consider: When wood and cellulose ferment in the ground,

they produce Wood Alcohol.

Which is Methanol..!

 

Thus, Nature is well aware of

Methanol, Oranges and some

other fruits and berries contain

it, There are berries that birds

and other wildlife can eat, which

we cannot, because their bodies

can metabolize it.

 

Existing Gasoline stations

Worldwide, could easily dovetail

Methanol sales into their operations, in the same way we

introduced unleaded gasoline.

 

Oil companies in drilling operations could capture natural gas and convert it for sale as Methanol, side by side with their

Oil gathering operations.

 

A new profit stream from their

current operations.

 

Coal companies, too, could

profit from the conversion

process, which was effectively

used by Germany in WWII.

 

Oh, it can be done ..!

 

Japan has developed a low-heat methane to Methanol bacterial conversion method, so costs should be low after the initial equipment is in place.

And!

Because Methanol Fuel cells

Currently exist, used by remote

Cellphone towers for reliable

Backup Power,

Methanol paves the way

for reliable backup Power

for Solar Panel homes,

and electric vehicles.

Consider, people...

in the next couple of decades,

Liquid Fuels are required.

Imagine attempting a 

Hurricane Katrina Cleanup

with electric vehicles, drills,

and power saws.

Don't tell me that raving

Climate Change Politicos

like the current Administration,

can stop future hurricanes,

tornadoes (the northeastern

U.S. just got 29 tornadoes in

January, 2024 !).

Bad disasters will happen,

and Fuel-based shipping, repair,

and Construction will still

be absolutely necessary.

Think !

 

 

 

Chuck