From the last three times we've talked on this forum:

1. We can start with this present thread, where your sarcasm was not founded.
https://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=30217#p436720
Everyone - you included - made fun of Ka; although you had, later on, to admit of its existence.
Plus, I did explain later on, the use of -ka, in fine compositi:
https://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=30217&start=20#p436927

.

2. On cit(assa), you have played the condescending pundit with a simple: "it's an ending"
https://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=30066&p=433633&hilit=citassa#p433574
Not even daring answering my demand for more information; and quite occulting the fact that I explained the use of assa in this particular instance, as the particular use of a noun compounded with a verb - usually done with verbs like kar (kṛ,) bhū, & in our case: as.

.

3. The last one is the most amazing of all three.
https://dhammawheel.com/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=29925&p=433111&hilit=Dmytro+root#p433107

In which you say that I should not use Vedic/Sanskrit roots, to compare with Pali ?!?!?

Then saying later to me, that you won't consider my - what you called "innovative" proposals (yet interesting) - unless I learn Pali - Giving me (condescendingly,) a book on Pali roots, by a great scholar on the matter, (which by the way, has most of the roots coming from post-Buddha's time ?!?!) - AND IN WHICH, in the introduction, it is said :

.... since we know from comparative study of the two languages, that the majority of the Pali words are derived from Sanskrit.
https://archive.org/stream/ThePaliRootsInSaddaniti/The%20Pali%20Roots%20in%20Saddaniti#page/n3/mode/2up

?!?!?!
How more farcical can this be ?!?!

.
I am just disturbing you - and you play the usual ostracising tricks - sarcasms, condescension, etc.
And now you play "victim" of my remarks.

That sounds a bit overdone to me.

________

*