Uh, most of this applies to B LM and does so better? E.g., tru mpism is more tolerant of difference and less prone to cen sorship. It is a lot less linguistically controlling or generally controlling. BL M has plenty of con tempt for the working class (the weak), especially when espoused by academics. Pacifism is most definitely traffic king with the enemy; you're not even supposed to speak to the 'far right'. The rejection of modernism is mighty thro bbing with 'lived experience', fl uid identities, condemnation of key thinkers, etc.

It's mostly just a description of a large family of assertive or embattled ideologies. The actual totalitarian measures like Newspeak or Disagreement is Treason are mixed with viewpoints to slander the latter.