JustPaste.it

Europe sociale

politique, économie et emploi et travail

Liens du site

Lutter contre le travail précaire en Europe: un moment critique

par Esther Lynch sur16 janvier 2019

travail précaire

Esther Lynch

La bonne nouvelle est que l’emploi dans l’UE atteint un record. La mauvaise nouvelle est qu’il s’agit en grande partie de travail précaire - et une directive en cours de rédaction doit être suffisamment sévère pour y remédier.

L'Europe connaît une crise croissante de travail précaire. Juste avant Noël, la Commission européenne a annoncétriomphalement  que l'emploi dans l'UE avait atteint des niveaux record dans la dernière partie de 2018, avec plus de 239 millions de personnes occupant un emploi. Bonne nouvelle, certes, mais la reconnaissance du fait que le nombre d'heures travaillées est toujours inférieur à celui de 2008, bien avant la crise, a été beaucoup moins soulignée Donc, peut-être qu'il y a plus d'emplois, mais qu'ils sont plus dispersés - parce que trop de personnes occupent des emplois précaires avec trop peu d'heures pour garantir une vie décente.

Pour les syndicats européens, l'un des engagements les plus importants issus du pilier européen des droits sociaux , lancé en novembre 2017, était un engagement à renforcer la sécurité juridique des travailleurs. Cela implique de lutter contre lesconditions de travail précaires et l'exploitation par les employeurs qui omettent d'informer les travailleurs de leurs conditions de travail ou ne s'attendent pas à ce qu'ils soient toujours disponibles - souvent dans les plus brefs délais - même s'ils ne travaillent pas et ne gagnent rien.

Consequently, in January 2018, the commission published proposals for a Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions Directive. It was weaker than the European Trade Union Confederation hoped but, nonetheless, includes very important protections for workers. For example, employers must supply written details of the employment relationship on the first day of work. This means that seasonal-agricultural, domestic, on-demand, platform and other precarious workers will get stronger legal rights. The draft goes further in proposing measures to ensure that online platforms are held accountable as employers.

It also takes important steps towards ending unfair terms in contracts, such as long probation periods, and stopping workers on flexible contracts having their hours cut back. And it requires member states to protect trade-union workplace representatives, helping workers to obtain their new rights, and recognises the important role of collective bargaining.

Yet the draft directive needed amendment to withstand the type of tactics unscrupulous employers will use to circumvent its provisions.

Join Almost 30.000 Social Europe Subscribers. It's Free!

 

“Social Europe publishes thought-provoking articles on the big political and economic issues of our time analysed from a European viewpoint. Indispensable reading”.

 

Polly ToynbeeColumnist for The Guardian

 

SIGN UP

The ETUC called on the European Parliament to toughen up the proposals and, as a result of trade union pressure, MEPs adopted changes which meet many of our demands. This is a major step forward. But the member states, meeting in the European Council, have been less co-operative, and the draft law is now under negotiation by the commission, council and parliament through the ‘trilogue’ procedure.

Trade unions regard this as a make-or-break moment to achieve new Europe-wide legislation that can have a real impact on working conditions. So the ETUC is pulling out all the stops to prevent this vital new law being watered down by member state governments. Its representatives have been meeting with member states’ permanent representatives in Brussels to explain our priorities and have urged MEPs to defend their position in the trilogue.

Wide-ranging benefits

The commission has indicated that the new legislation should enable up to 16 million people to start a new job knowing their rights and obligations. But, importantly for trade unions, it also covers workers already in employment.

The ETUC has watched the rise in precarious working conditions in Europe—platform working, zero-hours contracts, bogus self-employment and so on—with deep concern. Research in the UK found that young people on zero-hours contracts, for example, were far more likely to report mental and physical health problems than their counterparts in stable jobs. A study by the University of Limerick in Ireland warned that people on non-guaranteed hours could become ‘trapped in a cycle of poverty which strengthens employers’ control’, generating a fear of being penalised if they raised grievances about working conditions. In response, the Irish government has taken steps to prohibit the use of zero-hours contracts, unless the employer can show a genuine business need. Guaranteeing transparent and predictable working conditions would have wide-ranging benefits, in terms of workers’ health, work-life balance and employee retention.

Yet member states are attacking the draft by seeking to exempt specific groups of workers, including those on very low hours. Given that the whole aim of the legislation is to end the abuse of zero- and low-hours contracts—in particular when employers cut work at very short notice—the exclusion of this category would deprive the new law of most of its credibility. The commission originally set an exemption threshold (accepted by the parliament) of fewer than eight hours per month. Now the council wants to raise this to five hours per week.

But in reality any threshold will undermine the effectiveness of the legislation. Experience shows that, whatever the level set, exploitative employers will simply drop below it. An exemption would run the real risk of worsening vulnerable workers’ conditions, rather than improving them. There can be no justification for denying protection to the very workers who need it most.

Second-class workers?

The council also wants to exclude public-sector and other groups of workers—such as seafarers, emergency services (a catch-all category), managers, police and armed forces—and the self-employed from legal protection covering minimum rates, training, predictability and exclusivity clauses. But why should these workers be treated as second-class citizens? Why should a nurse be unprotected during probation or a seafarer punished for asking for more hours of work? Trade unions insist that all these exemptions, in both public and private sectors, must be removed.

Article 9 of the directive should provide greater certainty for workers and limit employers’ demands for flexibility. The ETUC wants to see the trilogue make improvements—encouraging member states to ban zero-hours contracts and guaranteeing that workers on irregular hours are still paid if their shift is cancelled at short notice. Employers should be obliged to justify the use of such practices and, after six months, a worker’s contract should be presumed to guarantee at least 75 per cent of the hours worked during that period.

Other improvements should also be upheld in the tripartite negotiations: employers should no longer be able to charge workers for necessary training, during which they should be paid, and unpaid trial periods must be ended. Employers should be legally required to consider workers’ requests for more hours or changes in working time, and to give a reasoned reply. And workers should not be dismissed or penalised for exercising these rights.

Trade unions need the right to include and enforce the directive’s provisions through collective agreements, at national or sectoral level, and to pursue complaints on behalf of members. Member states must also involve the social partners in implementing the law and impose sanctions on employers who fail to respect it.

According to the commission, banning exclusivity clauses—which allow employers to stop people taking other work even if they are on zero-hours contracts—could permit up to 364,000 on-demand workers to supplement their incomes, earning an extra €355-1,424 million and generating up to €167 million a year for businesses.

All these measures could, if fully implemented, significantly improve working conditions for millions of Europeans,. With the trilogue now resumed until February, the ETUC is watching progress attentively and continues to lobby and fight to ensure that the Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions Directive lives up to its name.

This column is sponsored by the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC).

About Esther Lynch

Esther Lynch was elected as ETUC Confederal Secretary at the Paris Congress in 2015. She has extensive experience of the trade union movement both in Ireland and at European and international level. Before joining the ETUC, she was the legislation and social affairs officer of the Irish Congress of Trade Unions (ICTU).

Social Europe Podcast

 

 

Social Europe Podcast

#37 - Mark Blyth: The crisis of globalisation, Brexit and other disasters waiting to happen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partner Ads

 

 

 

 

ETUI ADVERTISEMENT

Social policy in the European Union: state of play 2018

This year’s stock-take of Social Europe - Social Policy in the European Union: state of play 2018 - reports on recent EU and national social policymaking with a focus on the game-changing advent of the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) one year ago. A dominant feature of this annual review of social policy in the European Union is the way in which the EPSR has slowly but steadily started to influence EU policymaking, well before it was politically endorsed in November 2017.


FREE DOWNLOAD

EUROFOUND ADVERTISEMENT

Social and employment situation of people with disabilities

People with disabilities are among the most disadvantaged groups in the EU. This policy brief examines the social situation of people of working age with disabilities, using data from the 2011 and 2016 rounds of the European Quality of Life Survey (EQLS). The brief looks at changes over this period in employment, education and training, participation in society, social protection and healthcare, all priority areas of the European Disability Strategy.


FREE DOWNLOAD

SOCIAL EUROPE EDITION BOOK

Zygmunt Bauman was a towering intellectual who saw and analysed – right up to his death in early 2017 – the great socio-political changes, often convulsive, in modern western society long before his peers. Here we highlight his prescient insights into what he dubbed ‘liquid modernity’ with 24 chapters on topics ranging from online loneliness via precarity/poverty/inequality to migration, fear of the ‘Other’ and the decline of the nation state. Chronicle of Crisis, 2011-16, written by one of the great chroniclers of our times, will be read and re-read for decades and more to come.


MORE INFO

SOCIAL EUROPE EDITION BOOK

Is an unconditional basic income without means-test or work-test compatible with social justice and individual self-worth? Does it open up the space for an end to demeaning labour and a resurgence of voluntary work and cultural life? Is it affordable? This collection of short but compelling essays, all previously published in Social Europe, allows both proponents and opponents to make their case and is designed to extend this vital discussion to a wider audience.


MORE INFO

S&D GROUP ADVERTISEMENT

Sustainable Equality Report. Well-being for everyone in a sustainable Europe

Our societies are in the midst of political, economic, social and ecological crises, which permanently feed into each other, and already undermine democracy. Progressive politics with a common and strong vision are crucially needed. Ahead of the next European elections, the Sustainable Equality Report championed by the S&D Group through its Progressive Society initiative addresses this need, resulting in more than 100 concrete policy proposals by thirty policy-makers and renowned experts.


FREE DOWNLOAD

HANS-BÖCKLER-STIFTUNG ADVERTISEMENT

The Positive Economic Impact Of Germany's Statutory Minimum Wage

With the empirical analyses of the macroeconomic effects of the introduction of the statutory minimum wage in Germany, the IMK tries to determine the short-term and expected medium- to long-term growth, price and employment effects with the help of a macro-econometric model. As a result, economic growth tended to be stimulated by the introduction of the minimum wage. This was mainly due to the higher wages of the minimum wage beneficiaries and a spillover effect on adjoining wage groups. In particular, this benefited people whose low savings rate led to a particularly strong increase in real private consumption. The price increases triggered were negligible on a macroeconomic scale.


FREE DOWNLOAD

Email & Social Media

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Find Social Europe Content

© Social Europe Publishing & Consulting GmbH 2019

Leadership International De La Pensée