but no, apparently, like all Rich Spoiled Brats, you never admit being wrong…because you're NEVER wrong, right??? :)

so, it's been said that MAYBE it's the outlook board that didn't allow you to apologize…

Maybe so, but if unlike them, you thought apologizing was necessary, you could've resigned… Or maybe you're too attached to the Editor-In-Chief position… :)

Shame on you for allowing such an article to be posted in Outlook…

and Shame on you for allowing another article entitled "The Decline" by Ali Kassem to be posted in the same edition…

The first being discriminative against Homosexuals, the second against unveiled women…

grammatical editing? that's all you do??? well, apparently even in this, you're not that competent since both articles are a grammatical joke…

mistakes happen, and the right thing would be to apologize and try to fix the situation…

Neither you, nor the Outlook board did that…

and that's even scarier than what Sibai or Kassem wrote…

cos apparently, the sewers are your limit from now on???

what could be posted in Outlook under the flag of free speech later on???

a grammatically correct article defending marital rape maybe?

or simply defending rape, since after all, a rapist can simply propose to marry his victim and get away with it…

is that what articles will be about in the coming outlook editions?

is that your idea of Free speech???

SHAME on you…

you mostly Missy Editor-in-chief… with your spoiled bratish attitude refusing to apologize, or not resigning if you weren't allowed to do so…

and IN CASE it was the second option, how come bigots like Sibai and Kassem were allowed to publish hate articles in Outlook under the flag of free speech while YOU were not allowed to apologize under the same flag?

SHAME ON YOU!!!

the University, the newspaper, the newspaper's board AND your name, will be BASHED in articles published in REAL newspapers...

I'll make sure of it…